Study register / Risks & Safety / Cancer Risk

Cancer Risk

27 curated studies · 6 key studies · mechoulam.de

Note: This area collects studies on possible risks and safety aspects of cannabis. A high rating here means the risk is well evidenced, not that cannabis works therapeutically. This is how we show the evidence in both directions, in balance.

The evidence on cancer risk is inconsistent. For most cancer types, including lung and head-and-neck tumours, studies find no clear association, while for testicular cancer and heavy long-term use individual risk signals are reported.

Rating scheme

The letter rates the quality of a study, independently of its type. Every study type can receive any grade: a review can be B or C when it is small or weak, and an RCT can be S. The grade is a synthesis of study design, journal authority and clinical bindingness:

S
Highest evidence, large, methodologically first-rate studies or S3 guidelines
A
Strong evidence, solid, meaningful studies with a clear result
B
Moderate evidence, smaller or methodologically limited studies
C
Weak evidence, preliminary, indirect or contradictory findings
D
Lowest evidence, exploratory hints, single cases or expert opinion

Quality profile per study

To the left of each study there is a profile of four features, it shows the differences within a letter class.

Sample size
Number of participants (RCT) or included studies (review).
Blinding
Double-blind, single-blind or open-label.
Effect size
Clear benefit, mixed, no benefit or harm.
Citations / year
Age-adjusted citation frequency.

Central risk studies

6
  1. 01
    S
    Association Between Cannabis Use and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ghasemiesfe et al. ·2019 ·JAMA network open
    Read
  2. 02
    A
    Cannabis exposure and risk of testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurney et al. ·2015 ·BMC Cancer
    Read
  3. 03
    A
    Head and neck cancer among Cannabis users: A meta-analysis of matched case–control studies
    de Carvalho et al. ·2015 ·Archives of Oral Biology
    Read
  4. 04
    A
    Cannabis smoking and lung cancer risk: Pooled analysis in the International Lung Cancer Consortium
    Zhang et al. ·2015 ·International Journal of Cancer
    Read
  5. 05
    A
    Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study.
    Callaghan et al. ·2013 ·Cancer Causes & Control
    Read
  6. 06
    B
    Cancer risk and legalisation of access to cannabis in the USA: overview of the evidence.
    Nargis et al. ·2025 ·The Lancet. Public health
    Read

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Syntheses of RCT evidence following Cochrane and PRISMA standards.

9
S
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Key study
Ghasemiesfe et al. ·2019 ·JAMA network open
153 citations

Association Between Cannabis Use and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Design
Meta-Analyse
Sample
k = 25 Studien
n = 2 Pat.
Key finding

Weak evidence for an association between cannabis use and testicular germ cell tumors (>10 years of use), but no clear association found with head and neck, oral, or lung cancer.

Summary

Systematic review and meta-analysis on cannabis use and cancer risk; k=25 studies (19 case-control, 5 cohort, 1 cross-sectional study), published 1973–2019. Pooled analysis for 4 cancer types (lung, head and neck, oral squamous cell carcinomas, testicular germ cell tumors); ever use defined as ≥1 joint-year. Only 2 studies with low risk of bias; results reported as odds ratios with 95% CI.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size
Citations / year
Mehra et al. ·2006 ·Archives of Internal Medicine
171 citations

The association between Cannabis smoking and lung cancer: a systematic review.

Design
Systematische Review
Sample
k = 19 Studien
Key finding

Evidence of premalignant lung changes due to cannabis smoking, but no confirmed association with lung cancer after tobacco adjustment.

Summary

Systematic review (k=19 studies, Archives of Internal Medicine) on cannabis smoking and lung cancer risk. Biological plausibility demonstrated: increased tar exposure, alveolar macrophage dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, bronchial histopathology vs. tobacco smokers and non-smokers. However, observational studies showed NO significant association between cannabis smoking and lung cancer incidence after adjustment for tobacco use. Methodological limitations (selection bias, small sample sizes, young participant age with insufficient latency period). Conclusion: definitive statements on cancer risk not possible; educating patients about potential risks recommended.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Key study
Gurney et al. ·2015 ·BMC Cancer
142 citations

Cannabis exposure and risk of testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Design
Meta-Analyse
Sample
k = 3 Studien
Key finding

Current, chronic and frequent cannabis use is associated with increased risk of testicular germ cell tumors, especially for non-seminomas (OR 2,59 for weekly use).

Summary

Systematic review and meta-analysis on cannabis exposure and testicular cancer risk; k=3 case-control studies (USA, predominantly 1990s data). Strongest association for non-seminomas: weekly cannabis use OR=2,59 (95% CI 1,60–4,19) vs. never-use; current, chronic and frequent use associated with development of testicular germ cell tumors. Inconclusive evidence for seminomas.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Key study
de Carvalho et al. ·2015 ·Archives of Oral Biology
39 citations

Head and neck cancer among Cannabis users: A meta-analysis of matched case–control studies

Design
Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse (Fall-Kontroll-Studien)
Sample
k = 9 Studien
Key finding

There is no statistically significant association between lifetime cannabis use and the occurrence of head and neck carcinomas.

Summary

Meta-analysis of k=9 case-control studies; ~12,6% of cases vs. 14,3% of controls were cannabis users; no association between lifetime cannabis use and head and neck cancer risk (OR=1,021; 95% CI 0,912–1,14; p=0,718).

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Huang et al. ·2015 ·Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
105 citations

An epidemiologic review of Cannabis and cancer: an update.

Design
Epidemiologische Review mit gepoolten Risikoschätzern
Sample
Key finding

Cannabis use consistently increases testicular cancer risk, but shows no clear association with lung or head-and-neck carcinomas.

Summary

Epidemiological review of 34 studies on cannabis and cancer risk (k=34): Testicular cancer risk increased — pooled OR=1,56 (95% CI 1,09-2,23) with frequent use, OR=1,50 (95% CI 1,08-2,09) with ≥10 years of use; lung cancer studies predominantly do not support an association; insufficient data for other cancer sites.

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Baumeister et al. ·2021 ·Journal of thoracic oncology
29 citations

Cannabis Use, Pulmonary Function, and Lung Cancer Susceptibility: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Design
Meta-Analyse
Sample
n = 184.765 Pat. (gepoolt)
Key finding

Genetic predisposition for lifetime cannabis use was associated with increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 1,22, p = 0,003).

Summary

Two-sample Mendelian randomization on genetic predisposition for cannabis use and lung cancer risk (data: International Cannabis Consortium n=184.765, International Lung Cancer Consortium 29.266 cases + 56.450 controls). Genetic liability for lifetime cannabis use associated with increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma (OR=1.22, 95% CI 1.07–1.39, p=0.003, q=0.025). No association for other lung cancer subtypes; pleiotropy analyses unremarkable.

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Key study
Nargis et al. ·2025 ·The Lancet. Public health
12 citations

Cancer risk and legalisation of access to cannabis in the USA: overview of the evidence.

Design
Systematic Review
Sample
Systematische Review
Key finding

Indications of increased cancer risk for several cancer types (especially testicular tumors), but evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive.

Summary

Umbrella review on cancer risk evidence with cannabis legalization in the USA. Strongest association for non-seminomatous testicular cancer; emerging evidence for increased risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma, head-neck tumors, oral, breast, liver, cervical, laryngeal, pancreatic, thyroid and childhood cancer. Overall finding: suggestive, not conclusive; methodological limitations (confounder bias, misclassification) identified.

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Clark et al. ·2021 ·Cannabis and cannabinoid research
10 citations

Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis Suggests that Cannabis Use May Reduce Cancer Risk in the United States.

Design
Meta-Analyse
Sample
k = 34 Studien
n = 24 Pat.
Key finding

Non-significant trend towards reduced overall cancer risk (RR=0,90, p>0,06); after exclusion of selection and performance bias significantly reduced risk (RR=0,86, p<0,017); head and neck carcinomas showed significant risk reduction (RR=0,83), but high heterogeneity and low confidence in the results.

Summary

Scoping review with meta-analysis on cannabis use and cancer risk in the USA; k=34 studies (50 data points with risk ratios). Overall RR=0,90 (p>0,06, not significant, high heterogeneity I²=72,4%). After removal of studies with high selection/performance bias: RR=0,86 (p<0,017, Hedges g=0,66; N=24 data points), but still high heterogeneity (I²=74,9%). Testicular tumour: the only cancer type with RR>1 (RR=1,12, p=0,3, not significant). Head and neck carcinomas: negative association (RR=0,83, p<0,05, Hedges g=0,55). Data consistent with a negative association between cannabis use and non-testicular cancers, but low confidence due to high heterogeneity.

C
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size
Citations / year
Huang et al. ·2023 ·Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
21 citations

Causal relationship between cannabis use and cancer: a genetically informed perspective.

Design
Meta-Analyse
Sample
Meta-Analyse
Key finding

Cannabis use showed a significant but very small risk contribution for cervical cancer as well as weak indications for laryngeal and breast cancer; for the remaining cancer types no association was found.

Summary

Two-sample Mendelian Randomization on cannabis use and 9 cancer types (GWAS data, European ancestry). Significant causal association for cervical carcinoma (OR=1.001265, 95% CI 1.000375–1.002155, p=0.0053); suggestive evidence for laryngeal carcinoma (OR=1.000350, p=0.0336) and breast cancer (OR=1.003741, p=0.0467). No association with melanoma, colorectal, oral, esophageal carcinoma or glioma.

Real-World Evidence and Observational Studies

Data from routine clinical care, registries and mandatory reporting.

17
A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Liang et al. ·2009 ·Cancer Prevention Research
65 citations

A population-based case-control study of Cannabis use and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Design
Populationsbasierte Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 981 Pat.
Key finding

Moderate cannabis use was associated with a markedly reduced risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Summary

Population-based case-control study (n=434 HNSCC cases, n=547 controls, Boston MA); 10–20 years of cannabis use vs. never-users: significantly reduced HNSCC risk (OR=0,38, 95% CI 0,22–0,67); moderate weekly use also associated with reduced risk (OR=0,52, 95% CI 0,32–0,85); trend p<0,001; inverse association independent of HPV-16 antibody status.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Gillison et al. ·2008 ·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
1543 citations

Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie (krankenhaus-basiert)
Sample
n = 562 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis use is an independent risk factor for HPV-16-positive, but not for HPV-16-negative head and neck cancers.

Summary

Case-control study (n=240 HNSCC cases, n=322 controls): Cannabis use was independently associated with HPV-16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma — increasing dose-dependently with intensity (joints/month, p(trend)=0,007), duration (years, p(trend)=0,01) and cumulative joint-years (p(trend)=0,003). For HPV-16-negative HNSCC no association with cannabis use (OR not significant). Findings suggest cannabis-associated cancer risk specifically in the HPV-16-positive HNSCC subtype.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Efird et al. ·2004 ·Journal of Neuro-Oncology
122 citations

The risk for malignant primary adult-onset glioma in a large, multiethnic, managed-care cohort: cigarette smoking and other lifestyle behaviors.

Design
Prospektive Kohortenstudie
Sample
n = 133.811 Pat.
Key finding

Monthly cannabis use was associated with a significantly increased risk of malignant primary glioma (RR 2,8).

Summary

Prospective cohort study (n=133.811, Kaiser Permanente, up to 21 years follow-up); cannabis use ≥1x/month associated with 2,8-fold increased glioma risk (CI=1,3–6,2), adjusted for cigarette smoking, alcohol, age, sex, ethnicity. No dose-response relationship demonstrable. Increased risk among women for cigarette smoking (p-for-trend=0,04), not in men.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Sidney et al. ·1997 ·Cancer Causes & Control
150 citations

Cannabis use and cancer incidence (California, United States).

Design
Retrospektive Kohortenstudie
Sample
n = 64.855 Pat.
Key finding

No generally increased cancer risk from cannabis use, but indications of increased prostate and cervical cancer risk in those abstinent from tobacco nicotine.

Summary

Retrospective cohort study (n=64.855, mean follow-up 8,6 years): Cannabis use overall was not associated with increased cancer risk (RR=0,9 [95% CI 0,7–1,2] men; RR=1,0 [0,8–1,1] women). In non-smokers, cannabis use was associated with increased prostate cancer risk (RR=3,1 [95% CI 1,0–9,5]) and a tendency toward increased cervical cancer risk (RR=1,4 [95% CI 1,0–2,1]). No association with tobacco-related or colorectal cancers.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Key study
Zhang et al. ·2015 ·International Journal of Cancer
159 citations

Cannabis smoking and lung cancer risk: Pooled analysis in the International Lung Cancer Consortium

Design
Gepoolte Fall-Kontroll-Analyse
Sample
n = 5.144 Pat.
Key finding

There was no significant association between habitual cannabis smoking and lung cancer risk, although a possible effect at very high consumption cannot be excluded.

Summary

Pooled analysis k=6 case-control studies (International Lung Cancer Consortium), n=2.159 lung cancer cases + 2.985 controls; habitual vs. never use OR=0.96 (95% CI: 0.66–1.38); ≥1 joint/day OR=0.88 (95% CI: 0.63–1.24); ≥10 joint-years OR=0.94 (95% CI: 0.67–1.32). Adenocarcinoma OR=1.73 (95% CI: 0.75–4.00). Result: little evidence for increased lung cancer risk from cannabis smoking; a weak positive association with cumulative use cannot be excluded.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Hashibe et al. ·2006 ·Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
260 citations

Cannabis use and the risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers: results of a population-based case-control study.

Design
Bevölkerungsbasierte Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 2.252 Pat.
Key finding

No significant association between cannabis use and lung or aerodigestive tract cancer risk after adjustment for confounding.

Summary

Case-control study (n=1.212 cancer cases + n=1.040 controls) on cannabis use and lung/aerodigestive tumors; after adjustment for cigarette smoking no increased risk: aOR lung cancer ≥60 joint-years vs. 0 = 0.62 [95%-CI 0.32–1.2]; aOR oral cancer = 1.1 [95%-CI 0.56–2.1]. No consistent dose-response relationship.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Daling et al. ·2009 ·Cancer
143 citations

Association of Cannabis use and the incidence of testicular germ cell tumors.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie (populationsbasiert)
Sample
n = 1.348 Pat.
Key finding

Current cannabis use is associated with an increased risk of nonseminoma TGCT, with early onset of use and high frequency of use further increasing the risk.

Summary

Population-based case-control study (n=369 testicular germ cell tumor cases, n=979 age-matched controls); current cannabis use was associated with increased TGCT risk (OR=1,7; 95%-CI 1,1–2,5); for nonseminoma/mixed histology OR=2,3 (95%-CI 1,3–4,0); daily/weekly use OR=3,0; first use <18 years OR=2,8.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Thomas et al. ·2015 ·Urology
44 citations

Association between cannabis use and the risk of bladder cancer: results from the California Men's Health Study.

Design
Prospektive Kohortenstudie
Sample
n = 84.170 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis use was associated with reduced bladder cancer incidence, whereas tobacco use was associated with increased risk.

Summary

Prospective cohort study (n=84.170 men, 11 years follow-up): cannabis-only use associated with a 45% reduction in bladder cancer incidence vs. non-users (HR=0,55; 95% CI 0,31–1,00). Tobacco-only use, in contrast, with increased risk (HR=1,52; 95% CI 1,12–2,07). 279 (0,3%) bladder tumors in total; p<0,001 for frequency comparison.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Key study
Callaghan et al. ·2013 ·Cancer Causes & Control
188 citations

Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study.

Design
Populationsbasierte prospektive Kohortenstudie (40-Jahres-Follow-up)
Sample
n = 49.321 Pat.
Key finding

Heavy cannabis use was associated with a more than twofold increase in risk for lung cancer over 40 years.

Summary

n=49.321 Swedish men (age 18–20 y.), 40-year follow-up; heavy cannabis use (>50 times lifetime, n=831) was significantly associated with more than double the risk of lung cancer (HR=2,12; 95% CI 1,08–4,14), even after adjustment for tobacco use, alcohol, respiratory diseases and socioeconomic status.

A
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Rosenblatt et al. ·2004 ·Cancer Research
130 citations

Cannabis use and risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Design
Bevölkerungsbasierte Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 1.022 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis use was not associated with an increased risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma in this population-based study.

Summary

Population-based case-control study (n=407 OSCC cases + n=615 controls), cannabis use and risk of oral squamous cell carcinoma: adjusted OR=0,9 (95% CI 0,6–1,3), no increased risk. No trend with increasing duration of use, frequency, or time since first use. No subgroup effect (age, smoking, alcohol, genetic polymorphisms).

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Aldington et al. ·2008 ·European Respiratory Journal
257 citations

Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 403 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis smoking significantly increases the lung cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner, independent of cigarette smoking.

Summary

Case-control study (79 lung cancer cases, 324 controls, age ≤55 yrs, New Zealand): Lung cancer risk increased by 8% per joint-year of cannabis use (95% CI 2-15), adjusted for cigarette smoking; highest tertile of cannabis use: RR=5,7 (95% CI 1,5-21,6) vs. non-users.

B
Sample size
Blinding Single-blind
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Fligiel et al. ·1997 ·CHEST Journal
228 citations

Tracheobronchial histopathology in habitual smokers of cocaine, Cannabis, and/or tobacco.

Design
Observationelle Kohortenstudie (Bronchoskopie + Biopsie)
Sample
n = 241 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis and tobacco cause additive bronchial mucosal damage, whereas cocaine alone produces lesser changes, but intensifies tobacco-induced damage.

Summary

Cohort study (n=241) with bronchoscopy biopsies; cannabis smokers (n=40) showed significantly more histopathological mucosal changes than non-smokers in all 11 characteristics (p≤0,02); cannabis use and tobacco smoking show additive bronchial mucosal damage (MTS group); cocaine alone causes fewer changes than cannabis.

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Holly et al. ·1999 ·American Journal of Epidemiology
184 citations

Case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among women and heterosexual men in the San Francisco Bay Area, California.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie (populationsbasiert)
Sample
n = 3.376 Pat.
Key finding

Lifetime cannabis use was associated with a reduced risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Summary

Population-based case-control study (n=1.281 NHL cases, n=2.095 controls) on non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk factors in the San Francisco Bay Area 1988–1995; in multivariate analysis, lifetime cannabis use was associated with a significantly reduced NHL risk (direction: negative risk; OR <1,0 in the final model).

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Lacson et al. ·2012 ·Cancer
120 citations

Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between Cannabis use and nonseminoma risk.

Design
Populationsbasierte Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 455 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis use doubles the risk for non-seminoma of the testis (OR 2,42), while cocaine is inversely associated.

Summary

Case-control study (163 testicular cancer cases, 292 controls, Los Angeles County 1986–1991). Ever cannabis use: OR=1.94 (95%-CI 1.02–3.68) for testicular germ cell tumor overall; specifically non-seminoma/mixed tumors OR=2.42 (95%-CI 1.08–5.42). Adjusted for cryptorchidism, education, religiosity, cocaine. No increased overall risk for seminoma.

B
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Trabert et al. ·2011 ·Cancer
94 citations

Cannabis use and testicular germ cell tumors.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 335 Pat.
Key finding

Frequent cannabis use is associated with an approximately 2-fold increased TGCT risk, for nonseminomas increased up to 3-fold.

Summary

Hospital-based case-control study (n=187 testicular tumor cases, n=148 controls); frequent cannabis use (daily or more) vs. non-users OR=2,2 (95%-CI 1,0–5,1) for germ cell tumors overall; for non-seminoma: frequent use OR=3,1 (95%-CI 1,2–8,2); long-term use (≥10 years) OR=2,4 (95%-CI 1,0–6,1).

C
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Aldington et al. ·2008 ·Otolaryngology
63 citations

Cannabis use and cancer of the head and neck: case-control study.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 394 Pat.
Key finding

Cannabis use did not significantly increase the risk of head and neck carcinoma (RR=1,6; 95%-CI 0,5–5,2).

Summary

Case-control study (75 cases, 319 controls, ≤55 years): highest tertile of cannabis use (>8.3 joint-years) was not significantly associated with increased head and neck cancer risk (RR=1.6, 95% CI 0.5–5.2, not significant after confounder adjustment). No statistically significant association between cannabis use and head and neck carcinoma; limited statistical power does not rule out a small long-term effect.

C
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Chacko et al. ·2006 ·Urology
70 citations

Association between Cannabis use and transitional cell carcinoma.

Design
Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Sample
n = 156 Pat.
Key finding

Habitual cannabis use was significantly associated with the occurrence as well as with the stage, grade, and recurrence frequency of urothelial carcinoma.

Summary

n=52 men <60 years of age with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) vs. n=104 age-matched controls. 88,5% of TCC patients reported habitual cannabis use vs. 69,2% of controls (P=0.008). Cannabis use correlated significantly with tumor stage, grade, and recurrence frequency within the TCC group. Indication of increased TCC risk from cannabis smoking.

Mechanistic and Preclinical Studies

Pharmacological foundations and animal-model findings on mechanistic plausibility.

1
B
Sample size
Blinding Open-label
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Wu et al. ·1988 ·New England Journal of Medicine
517 citations

Pulmonary hazards of smoking Cannabis as compared with tobacco.

Design
Experimentelle Vergleichsstudie (kontrolliert)
Sample
Präklinisch - n = 15
Key finding

Cannabis smoking causes a markedly higher respiratory burden of CO and tar compared to tobacco.

Summary

n=15 men with long-term cannabis and tobacco use (≥5 years); cannabis smoking vs. tobacco: ~5-fold higher increase in blood carboxyhemoglobin, ~3-fold more inhaled tar, 1/3 more tar retention in the respiratory tract (p<0.001); puff volume ~2/3 larger, inhalation depth 1/3 greater, breath-hold duration ~4-fold longer (p<0.01) — independent of THC content. Increased respiratory pollutant burden (carbon monoxide, tar); a direct cancer risk is not demonstrated.