Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
High
39 citations
Samplek = 9 Studien
ControlNever cannabis users
EndpointOdds ratio
Blindingn.a.
DesignSystematische Review + Meta-Analyse (Fall-Kontroll-Studien)
Routeinhalativ
Key finding
There is no statistically significant association between lifetime cannabis use and the occurrence of head and neck carcinomas.
Summary
Meta-analysis of k=9 case-control studies; ~12,6% of cases vs. 14,3% of controls were cannabis users; no association between lifetime cannabis use and head and neck cancer risk (OR=1,021; 95% CI 0,912–1,14; p=0,718).
P
PopulationPatients with head and neck carcinoma vs. control persons; pooled data from 9 case-control studies
I
InterventionCannabis use (lifetime exposure, smoked)
C
ControlNever cannabis users (matched controls)
O
OutcomeNo significant association between cannabis use and head and neck carcinoma (OR=1,021; 95%-CI 0,912–1,14; p=0,718)
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
DOI
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.009↗
Design: Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse (Fall-Kontroll-Studien)
Share
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>The scientific literature presents conflicting data on a possible causal relationship between Cannabis users and the development of head and neck cancer.<h4>Design</h4>This study performed a systematic review with meta-analysis. Articles were selected from various electronic databases using keywords obtained from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). After reading by three reviewers and scoring of methodological quality, six articles (totaling nine case-control studies) were assessed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis(®) software. The value of effect (odds ratio) was calculated, which represented the chance of developing head and neck cancer between individuals who had smoked Cannabis in their lifetime in models controlled for age, gender, race, and tobacco consumption.<h4>Results</h4>Approximately 12.6% of cases and 14.3% of controls were Cannabis users. The meta-analysis found no association between exposure and disease (OR=1.021; IC 95%=0.912-1.14; p=0.718).<h4>Conclusion</h4>No association between lifetime Cannabis use and the development of head and neck cancer was found. The different methods of collection/presentation of results in the selected articles prevented other analyzes from being conducted. Additional studies are needed to assess for long-term effects.
The impediment to action advances action.