Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
Moderate
260 citations
Samplen = 2.252 Pat.
ControlCancer-free control persons with no or…
EndpointOdds ratio
Blindingn.a.
DesignBevölkerungsbasierte Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Routeinhalativ
Key finding
No significant association between cannabis use and lung or aerodigestive tract cancer risk after adjustment for confounding.
Summary
Case-control study (n=1.212 cancer cases + n=1.040 controls) on cannabis use and lung/aerodigestive tumors; after adjustment for cigarette smoking no increased risk: aOR lung cancer ≥60 joint-years vs. 0 = 0.62 [95%-CI 0.32–1.2]; aOR oral cancer = 1.1 [95%-CI 0.56–2.1]. No consistent dose-response relationship.
P
PopulationAdults with incident lung and upper aerodigestive tract carcinomas as well as cancer-free controls, matched for age, sex and area of residence; n=1.212 cases, n=1.040 controls (Los Angeles)
I
InterventionCannabis use (cumulative in joint-years, ≥30 or ≥60 joint-years)
C
ControlCancer-free control persons with no or lower cannabis use (0 joint-years)
O
OutcomeAfter adjustment for confounders including cigarette smoking, no significant association: OR for lung cancer (≥60 vs. 0 joint-years) 0,62 (95%-CI 0,32–1,2); OR for oral cancer 1,1 (0,56–2,1); OR for laryngeal cancer 0,84 (0,28–2,5); OR for pharyngeal cancer 0,57 (0,20–1,6); OR for esophageal cancer 0,53 (0,22–1,3)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Despite several lines of evidence suggesting the biological plausibility of Cannabis being carcinogenic, epidemiologic findings are inconsistent. We conducted a population-based case-control study of the association between Cannabis use and the risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers in Los Angeles.<h4>Methods</h4>Our study included 1,212 incident cancer cases and 1,040 cancer-free controls matched to cases on age, gender, and neighborhood. Subjects were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire. The cumulative use of Cannabis was expressed in joint-years, where 1 joint-year is equivalent to smoking one joint per day for 1 year.<h4>Results</h4>Although using Cannabis for > or =30 joint-years was positively associated in the crude analyses with each cancer type (except pharyngeal cancer), no positive associations were observed when adjusting for several confounders including cigarette smoking. The adjusted odds ratio estimate (and 95% confidence limits) for > or =60 versus 0 joint-years was 1.1 (0.56, 2.1) for oral cancer, 0.84 (0.28, 2.5) for laryngeal cancer, and 0.62 (0.32, 1.2) for lung cancer; the adjusted odds ratio estimate for > or =30 versus 0 joint-years was 0.57 (0.20, 1.6) for pharyngeal cancer, and 0.53 (0.22, 1.3) for esophageal cancer. No association was consistently monotonic across exposure categories, and restriction to subjects who never smoked cigarettes yielded similar findings.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Our results may have been affected by selection bias or error in measuring lifetime exposure and confounder histories; but they suggest that the association of these cancers with Cannabis, even long-term or heavy use, is not strong and may be below practically detectable limits.
The impediment to action advances action.