Psychosis Risk
Study register · detail RCT (cross-over, gesunde Probanden) · Psychosis Risk · 2012

Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers

Mixed GRADE Moderate 288 citations
Samplen = 16 Pat.
Duration3 sessions at one-month…
ControlPlacebo
EndpointSymptom scaling
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (cross-over, gesunde Probanden)
Cannabinoidkombination
Max. dose600.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

THC induced pronounced acute psychological and physiological effects, CBD was indistinguishable from placebo.

Summary

Randomised double-blind cross-over trial n=16 healthy male subjects; oral THC 10 mg vs. CBD 600 mg vs. placebo; THC vs. placebo: significant positive psychotic symptoms, anxiety, dysphoria (AUC and effect at 2h: p<0,01); CBD: no significant differences from placebo on psychotic or anxiety symptoms — CBD safety signal with regard to psychosis.

P
PopulationHealthy male subjects, n=16
I
InterventionOral THC 10 mg or oral CBD 600 mg, single dose, cross-over
C
ControlPlacebo (oral)
O
OutcomeTHC vs. placebo/CBD: significantly more anxiety, dysphoria, psychotic symptoms, sedation, subjective intoxication (AUC and 2h effect p<0,01) as well as increased heart rate (p<0,05); no differences between CBD and placebo
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Martin-Santos R, A. Crippa J, Batalla A et al.
DOI 10.2174/138161212802884780
Design: RCT (cross-over, gesunde Probanden)
Share
Abstract
<h4>Rationale</h4>Animal and humans studies suggest that the two main constituents of cannabis sativa, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have quite different acute effects. However, to date the two compounds have largely been studied separately.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate and compare the acute pharmacological effects of both THC and CBD in the same human volunteers.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo controlled trial was conducted in 16 healthy male subjects. Oral THC 10 mg or CBD 600 mg or placebo was administered in three consecutive sessions, at one-month interval. Physiological measures and symptom ratings were assessed before, and at 1, 2 and 3 hours post drug administration. The area under the curve (AUC) between baseline and 3 hours, and the maximum absolute change from baseline at 2 hours were analysed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance, with drug condition (THC or CBD or placebo) as the factor.<h4>Results</h4>Relative to both placebo and CBD, administration of THC was associated with anxiety, dysphoria, positive psychotic symptoms, physical and mental sedation, subjective intoxication (AUC and effect at 2 hours: p < 0.01), an increase in heart rate (p < 0.05). There were no differences between CBD and placebo on any symptomatic, physiological variable.<h4>Conclusions</h4>In healthy volunteers, THC has marked acute behavioural and physiological effects, whereas CBD has proven to be safe and well tolerated.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius