Psychosis Risk
Study register · detail Multizentrisches Fall-Kontroll-Studie · Psychosis Risk · 2019

The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study

Harm GRADE Low 844 citations
Samplen = 2.138 Pat.
DurationMay 2010 to April 2015
ControlNever-users
EndpointOdds for first-episode…
Blindingn.a.
DesignMultizentrisches Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Key finding

Daily use of high-potency cannabis markedly increases the risk of first-episode psychosis and explains a substantial part of the site-related incidence differences.

Summary

Multicentre EU-GEI case-control study (n=901 cases, n=1237 controls, 11 European sites): daily cannabis use OR=3,2 (95% CI 2,2–4,1) for psychotic disorder; daily high-potency cannabis OR=4,8 (95% CI 2,5–6,3). Population attributable fraction (PAF) for high-potency cannabis: 12,2% overall, 30,3% in London, 50,3% in Amsterdam. Incidence rate correlated positively with high-potency prevalence (r=0,7; p=0,0286) and daily use (r=0,8; p=0,0109).

P
PopulationAdults (18–64 years) with first-episode psychosis at 11 sites in Europe and Brazil as well as population-representative controls; n=2.138 (901 cases, 1.237 controls)
I
InterventionCannabis use (daily and/or high-potency, THC ≥10%) as exposure
C
ControlNever-users (controls without cannabis use)
O
OutcomeDaily high-potency cannabis use associated with almost 5-fold increased odds for psychosis (adj. OR 4,8; 95% CI 2,5–6,3); positive association between prevalence of daily use and incidence rates (r=0,8; p=0,0109)
Confidence in the evidence
Low

The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Authors
Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, et al.
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30048-3
Design: Multizentrisches Fall-Kontroll-Studie
Share
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of later psychotic disorder but whether it affects incidence of the disorder remains unclear. We aimed to identify patterns of cannabis use with the strongest effect on odds of psychotic disorder across Europe and explore whether differences in such patterns contribute to variations in the incidence rates of psychotic disorder.<h4>Methods</h4>We included patients aged 18-64 years who presented to psychiatric services in 11 sites across Europe and Brazil with first-episode psychosis and recruited controls representative of the local populations. We applied adjusted logistic regression models to the data to estimate which patterns of cannabis use carried the highest odds for psychotic disorder. Using Europe-wide and national data on the expected concentration of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the different types of cannabis available across the sites, we divided the types of cannabis used by participants into two categories: low potency (THC <10%) and high potency (THC ≥10%). Assuming causality, we calculated the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the patterns of cannabis use associated with the highest odds of psychosis and the correlation between such patterns and the incidence rates for psychotic disorder across the study sites.<h4>Findings</h4>Between May 1, 2010, and April 1, 2015, we obtained data from 901 patients with first-episode psychosis across 11 sites and 1237 population controls from those same sites. Daily cannabis use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·2, 95% CI 2·2-4·1), increasing to nearly five-times increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis (4·8, 2·5-6·3). The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12·2% (95% CI 3·0-16·1) of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30·3% (15·2-40·0) in London and 50·3% (27·4-66·0) in Amsterdam. The adjusted incident rates for psychotic disorder were positively correlated with the prevalence in controls across the 11 sites of use of high-potency cannabis (r = 0·7; p=0·0286) and daily use (r = 0·8; p=0·0109).<h4>Interpretation</h4>Differences in frequency of daily cannabis use and in use of high-potency cannabis contributed to the striking variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across the 11 studied sites. Given the increasing availability of high-potency cannabis, this has important implications for public health.<h4>Funding source</h4>Medical Research Council, the European Community's Seventh Framework Program grant, São Paulo Research Foundation, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and the NIHR BRC at University College London, Wellcome Trust.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius