Appetite Stimulation
Study register · detail Klinische Studie · Appetite Stimulation · 2025

Benefits and Burdens of Vaporized Botanical Cannabis Flower Bud for Cancer-Related Anorexia: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of People with Advanced Cancer Enrolled as Inpatients in a Phase I/IIb Clinical Trial and Their Family Carers.

Mixed GRADE Moderate 0 citations
Samplen = 16 Pat.
Durationunclear
EndpointPerceived benefit/burden
Blindingunklar
DesignKlinische Studie
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Routeinhalativ
Key finding

All participants perceived improvements in eating, in two cases due to nausea reduction rather than appetite stimulation; psychoactive effects were well tolerated, but transient burdens such as throat irritation and unpleasant taste/smell effects were reported.

Summary

n=16 (10 patients with advanced cancer + 6 caregiving family members), vaporised cannabis flowers for tumour-associated anorexia; all respondents perceived improvements in eating, whereby in two cases this was attributed to nausea reduction rather than appetite stimulation. Psychoactive effects well tolerated; transient burdens due to throat irritation and taste.

P
PopulationAdults with advanced cancer (inpatient, palliative care unit), n=10 study participants + 6 family members
I
InterventionVaporised botanical cannabis flower mixture (phase I/IIb clinical trial)
O
OutcomeAll participants reported perceived benefits regarding eating behaviour; psychoactive effects well tolerated; burdens: throat irritation as well as unpleasant smell/taste (transient)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Luckett T, Razmovski-Naumovski V, Garcia M, Phillips J, Chye R, Noble B, Fazekas B, Martin J, Agar M
DOI 10.1177/10966218251372439
Design: Klinische Studie
Share
Abstract
Background: Clinical trials are underway of medicinal cannabis for cancer-related anorexia, using various formulations and modes of administration. Objectives: To explore the benefits and burdens of vaporized medicinal cannabis flower bud for anorexia from the perspectives of trial participants with advanced cancer and their carers. Design: People with advanced cancer enrolled as inpatients in a Phase I/IIb clinical trial, and their carers participated in face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Analysis used the framework method. Setting: Inpatient specialist palliative care. Results: Ten out of 12 trial participants and 6 carers were interviewed. All perceived benefits to eating but, in two cases, this arose from reduced nausea rather than appetite stimulation. Carers sometimes perceive more benefit than patients. Psychoactive effects were well-tolerated and even enjoyed. Burdens included throat irritation and adverse smell and taste, but these were transient. Conclusions: Vaporized flower bud warrants comparison with other formulations/modes of medicinal cannabis for cancer-related anorexia.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius