Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Study register · detail RCT · Irritable Bowel Syndrome · 2012

Randomized pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic trial of dronabinol effects on colon transit in irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea.

No benefit demonstrated GRADE Moderate 96 citations
Samplen = 36 Pat.
Duration2 days
ControlPlacebo orally twice daily for 2 days
EndpointColonic transit
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose10.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

Dronabinol 2,5 or 5 mg twice daily for 2 days showed overall no effect on gastrointestinal transit in IBS-D, although a possible genotype-specific delay of colonic transit in CNR1 rs806378 CT/TT carriers was observed.

Summary

RCT, n=36 IBS-D patients, dronabinol 2,5 mg (n=10) or 5 mg (n=13) vs. placebo (n=13) for 2 days. No significant overall treatment effects on gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit demonstrable. Genotype-dependent trend: CNR1 rs806378 CT/TT associated with moderately delayed colonic transit at 24 h (p=0,13 for differential treatment effects).

P
PopulationAdults with irritable bowel syndrome (diarrhea-type, IBS-D), n=36
I
InterventionDronabinol (DRO) 2,5 mg or 5 mg orally twice daily for 2 days
C
ControlPlacebo orally twice daily for 2 days
O
OutcomeNo significant overall treatment effect of DRO on gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit; CNR1 rs806378 CT/TT genotype associated with a trend toward delayed colonic transit at 24 h (p=0,13 for genotype interaction)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Wong BS, Camilleri M, Eckert D, Carlson P, Ryks M, Burton D, Zinsmeister AR
Share
Abstract
Background: Genetic variation in endocannabinoid metabolism is associated with colonic transit in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea (IBS-D). The nonselective cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonist, dronabinol (DRO), reduced fasting colonic motility in nonconstipated IBS. FAAH and CNR1 variants influenced DRO's effects on colonic motility. Our aims were: (i) to compare dose-related effects of DRO to placebo (PLA) on gut transit in IBS-D, and (ii) to examine influence of genetic variations in CB mechanisms on DRO's transit effects. Methods: Thirty-six IBS-D volunteers were randomized (double-blind, concealed allocation) to twice per day PLA (n = 13), DRO 2.5 mg (n = 10), or DRO 5 mg (n = 13) for 2 days. We assessed gastric, small bowel, and colonic transit by validated radioscintigraphy and genotyped the single nucleotide polymorphisms CNR1 rs806378 and FAAH rs324420. Data analysis utilized a dominant genetic model. Key Results: Overall treatment effects of DRO on gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit were not detected. CNR1 rs806378 CT/TT was associated with a modest delay in colonic transit at 24 h compared with CC (P = 0.13 for differential treatment effects on postminus pretreatment changes in colonic transit by genotype). No significant interaction of treatment with FAAH rs324420 was detected. Conclusions & Inferences: Overall, DRO 2.5 or 5 mg twice per day for 2 days had no effect on gut transit in IBS-D. There appears to be a treatment-by-genotype effect, whereby DRO preferentially delays colonic transit in those with the CNR1 rs806378 CT/TT genotypes. Further study of CB pharmacogenetics may help identify a subset of IBS-D patients most likely to benefit from CB agonist therapy.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius