Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
32 citations
Samplen = 273 Pat.
Duration12 weeks
ControlPlacebo orally three times daily, 12 weeks
EndpointAAPS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Max. dose150.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding
Primary endpoint not met (no significant difference vs. placebo), but significant improvement in subgroup with baseline AAPS ≥6.5 under olorinab 50 mg.
Summary
Phase 2b RCT CAPTIVATE, n=273 IBS-D/IBS-C patients, olorinab (CB2 full agonist) 10/25/50 mg 3× daily vs. placebo over 12 weeks. Primary endpoint (change in average abdominal pain score up to week 12) not met. Pre-specified subgroup with moderate-severe pain (baseline score ≥6,5): olorinab 50 mg (n=35) significantly more effective than placebo (n=30), p=0,014. Tolerability comparable to placebo, no serious adverse events.
P
PopulationAdults (18–70 years) with IBS-D or IBS-C (Rome IV criteria), n=273
I
InterventionOlorinab (CB2 agonist) 10 mg, 25 mg or 50 mg orally three times daily, 12 weeks
C
ControlPlacebo orally three times daily, 12 weeks
O
OutcomePrimary endpoint (AAPS change from baseline to week 12) not significant for all doses vs. placebo; in prespecified subgroup (AAPS ≥6,5) significant improvement with olorinab 50 mg vs. placebo (p=0,014)
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: Olorinab is a highly selective, peripherally acting, full agonist of cannabinoid receptor 2. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of olorinab to treat abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) and constipation (IBS-C).
Methods: CAPTIVATE was a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Eligible participants aged 18-70 years with IBS-C and IBS-D diagnosed per Rome IV received olorinab 10 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg three times daily (TID) or placebo TID for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in patient-reported average abdominal pain score (AAPS) from baseline to Week 12.
Key Results: A total of 273 participants were randomized to receive olorinab 10 mg (n = 67), olorinab 25 mg (n = 67), olorinab 50 mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). Although a treatment response was observed across all groups, the weekly change in average AAPS from baseline to Week 12 was not significantly different between placebo and any olorinab dose. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of participants with a baseline AAPS >/=6.5, olorinab 50 mg (n = 35) significantly improved AAPS compared with placebo (n = 30) (p = 0.014). Adverse event rates were comparable between olorinab and placebo and there were no reported serious adverse events or deaths.
Conclusion And Inferences: Although olorinab was well-tolerated and improved weekly AAPS, the primary endpoint was not met. However, in participants with moderate-to-severe pain at baseline (AAPS >/=6.5), olorinab 50 mg significantly improved weekly AAPS compared with placebo.
Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT04043455.
The impediment to action advances action.