Ulcerative Colitis
Study register · detail RCT · Ulcerative Colitis · 2018

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Pilot Study of Cannabidiol-rich Botanical Extract in the Symptomatic Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Mixed GRADE Moderate 158 citations
Samplen = 29 Pat.
Duration10 weeks
ControlPlacebo capsules
EndpointRemission rate
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Routeoral
Key finding

Primary endpoint (remission rate) not achieved (CBD 28% vs. placebo 26%), but secondary analyses showed advantages of the CBD-rich extract for Mayo scores and subjective parameters.

Summary

n=29 ulcerative colitis, 10 weeks CBD-rich cannabis extract (2×50 mg CBD orally) vs. placebo; no significant difference in the primary endpoint (clinical remission: 28% CBD vs. 26% placebo, p=0.97); quality of life (IBDQ) improved non-significantly (p=0.36); well tolerated.

P
PopulationAdults ≥18 years with left-sided or extensive ulcerative colitis, Mayo score 4-10 (endoscopy score ≥1), stable 5-ASA therapy, n not specified in the abstract
I
InterventionCBD-rich botanical extract (capsules), 10 weeks, dose not specified in the abstract
C
ControlPlacebo capsules
O
OutcomePrimary endpoint (remission rate) negative: CBD 28% vs. placebo 26%, n.s. Per-protocol analysis shows trend for Mayo scores (p=0.068/0.038) and quality of life (p=0.003-0.069) favouring CBD
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Irving P M, Iqbal T, Nwokolo C et al.
DOI 10.1093/ibd/izy002
Design: RCT
Share
Abstract
Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) exhibits anti-inflammatory properties that could improve disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. This proof-of-concept study assessed efficacy, safety and tolerability of CBD-rich botanical extract in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older, with left-sided or extensive UC, Mayo scores of 4-10 (endoscopy scores ≥1), and on stable 5-aminosalicylic acid dosing, were randomized to 10-weeks' CBD-rich botanical extract or placebo capsules. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients in remission after treatment. Statistical testing was 2-sided, using a 10% significance level. Results: Patients were less tolerant of CBD-rich botanical extract compared with placebo, taking on average one-third fewer capsules, and having more compliance-related protocol deviations (principally insufficient exposure), prompting identification of a per protocol (PP) analysis set. The primary endpoint was negative; end of treatment remission rates were similar for CBD-rich botanical extract (28%) and placebo (26%). However, PP analysis of total and partial Mayo scores favoured CBD-rich botanical extract (P = 0.068 and P = 0.038, respectively). Additionally, PP analyses of the more subjective physician's global assessment of illness severity, subject global impression of change, and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes were improved for patients taking CBD-rich botanical extract (P = 0.069, P = 0.003, and P = 0.065, respectively). Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild/moderate with many in the CBD-rich botanical extract group potentially attributable to the ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol content. A greater proportion of gastrointestinal-related AEs, indicative of UC worsening, was seen on placebo. Conclusion: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, several signals suggest CBD-rich botanical extract may be beneficial for symptomatic treatment of UC.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius