Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
8 citations
Samplek = 8 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo or control group
EndpointClinical disease activity
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding
Cannabinoids showed improvements in disease activity in Crohn's disease and quality of life in both IBD forms, but no significant effects on UC activity, endoscopic findings or inflammatory markers.
Summary
Meta-analysis across k=8 RCTs on cannabinoids in IBD (4 Crohn's, 3 UC, 1 both diseases). For UC: clinical disease activity not significantly improved (RR=-2,13; 95% CI -4,80 to 0,55; I²=90,3%). Improvement in quality of life for both Crohn's disease and UC (RR=1,79; 95% CI 0,92-2,66; I²=82,8%). No differences in endoscopic activity or inflammatory markers.
P
PopulationAdults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), pooled from 8 RCTs
I
InterventionCannabinoids (various formulations, details per primary study)
C
ControlPlacebo or control group
O
OutcomeSignificant reduction in clinical disease activity in CD (RR -0,91; 95% CI -1,54 to -0,28; I²=71,9%); no significant reduction in UC (RR -2,13; 95% CI -4,80 to 0,55; I²=90,3%); significant improvement in quality of life in CD and UC combined (RR 1,79; 95% CI 0,92–2,66; I²=82,8%); no difference in endoscopic activity and inflammatory markers
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: With the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis, patients and providers have growing interest in the role of cannabinoids in treating inflammatory bowel disease. Prior meta-analysis has shown inconclusive evidence for efficacy of cannabinoids. We sought to produce an up-to-date meta-analysis that pools new data to evaluate the therapeutic effects of cannabinoids in both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL were queried for randomized-controlled trials evaluating the impact cannabinoids in CD or UC. Random effects modeling was used to compute pooled estimates of risk difference. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2.
Results: Eight studies, including 4 studies of CD, 3 studies of UC, and 1 study of both diseases met inclusion criteria. Among 5 studies of CD, a statistically significant decrease in clinical disease activity following intervention was observed (risk ratios [RR], -0.91; 95% CI, CI:1.54 to CI:0.28, I2 = 71.9%). Clinical disease activity in UC was not significantly lower in the pooled analysis (RR, -2.13; 95% CI, -4.80 to 0.55; I2 = 90.3%). Improvement in quality of life (QoL) was observed in both CD and UC combined (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.92-0.2.66; I2 = 82.8%), as well as individually. No differences were observed in the analysis on endoscopic disease activity and inflammatory markers.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis of clinical trials suggests that cannabinoids are associated with improved quality of life in both CD and UC, as well as improved disease activity but not inflammation.
The impediment to action advances action.