Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
Low
31 citations
Samplen = 283 Pat.
Duration1 year
ControlNon-cannabis users within the same MMT…
EndpointTreatment retention
Blindingn.a.
DesignProspektive Kohortenstudie (1 Jahr)
Key finding
Cannabis use had no significant influence on treatment retention or medical-psychological outcomes in MMT.
Summary
Prospective 1-year cohort study (n=283 MMT patients, n=196 after 1 year of follow-up) at an Israeli methadone clinic; cannabis lifetime prevalence 75%, current abuse 25%; cannabis users had NO significantly worse treatment retention, no increased psychological distress and no increased HIV/HCV risk behavior vs. non-users — no negative influence on MMT outcome.
P
PopulationPatients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) at an Israeli clinic, n=283 (total population); n=196 with completed 1-year follow-up
I
InterventionObservation of cannabis use in the context of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT); no experimental intervention
C
ControlNon-cannabis users (NCAs) within the same MMT cohort
O
OutcomeNo significant difference between cannabis users and non-users with regard to treatment retention, psychological distress, infectious diseases or HIV/HCV risk behavior; cannabis users more frequently showed polydrug abuse
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
<h4>Objective</h4>We addressed the following questions. What are the current and lifetime prevalence of cannabis abuse in an Israeli methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinic? Does cannabis abuse change over time during MMT? Is cannabis abuse related to treatment outcome measures such as retention rate and the abuse of drugs? Is the abuse of cannabis related to psychopathology, HIV/HCV risk-taking and infectious diseases? Do cannabis abusers (CAs) have a different psychosocial and demographic profile than nonabusers (NCAs)? Is cannabis abuse part of a polydrug abuse tendency or a distinct substance of abuse?<h4>Method</h4>Overlapping samples of either the entire clinic population (n = 283) or all the patients who had completed 1 year of MMT treatment (n = 196 of which 20 were re-entering) underwent random and twice-weekly observed urine analysis for various drugs of abuse, responded to self-report questionnaires (SCL-90-R; HIV/HCV risk-taking behaviours; n = 164), interviews (ASI, n = 176; SCID, n = 151) and hepatitis C and HIV testing (n = 149).<h4>Results</h4>Lifetime abuse prevalence was found in 75% and current abuse at MMT intake in 25%. Abuse did not increase significantly over a 1-year period. Cannabis abusers were found to be more often polydrug abusers than NCAs. Cannabis abusers did not suffer from more psychological distress, infectious diseases, and did not engage in more HCV/HIV risk-taking behaviour, nor did they leave treatment earlier than NCAs.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Cannabis abuse MMT patients should be treated as polydrug abusers, although no specific influences of cannabis abuse on psychological and medical conditions of MMT patients have been observed. Treatment policy should take these results into consideration.
The impediment to action advances action.