Dependence Risk
Study register · detail Systematic Review · Dependence Risk · 2025

High-Potency Cannabis Use and Health: A Systematic Review of Observational and Experimental Studies.

Mixed GRADE High 15 citations
Samplek = 42 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlLow-potency cannabis
EndpointHealth outcomes
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Routeinhalativ
Key finding

In the domain "problematic cannabis use" an association with higher-potency cannabis was suggested; in other areas findings were less consistent, but tended toward worse outcomes with higher potency.

Summary

Systematic review on high-potency cannabis and health; k=42 studies from 4.545 screened records. Potency categories: 1-9% THC, 10-19%, 20-30%, kief/resin (~30-50%), concentrates (≥60%). Suggestive association between higher potency and 'problem cannabis use'; inconsistent findings in Mental Health, Other Substance Use. Therapeutic outcomes limited and mixed. GRADE certainty: 'very low'. Need for prospective studies on cardiorespiratory, cancer, pre-/perinatal outcomes.

P
PopulationPersons with cannabis use of varying THC potency (studies on health effects), pooled from 42 primary studies
I
InterventionHigh-potency cannabis (various THC concentration categories: 1–9%, 10–19%, 20–30%, kief/resin ~30–50%, concentrates ≥60%)
C
ControlLow-potency cannabis (lower THC concentration)
O
OutcomeAssociations with problematic cannabis use suggestive; other domains (mental health, substance use) inconsistent; overall evidence: 'very low' (GRADE)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Lake S, Murray CH, Henry B, Strong L, White K, Kilmer B, Cooper ZD
DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.20240269
Design: Systematic Review
Share
Abstract
Objective: Amid continuously rising concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in cannabis (i.e., potency), high-potency cannabis is a major topic in contemporary cannabis policy discussions, yet its impact on health is not well understood. The authors conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between high-potency cannabis use and a range of health outcomes. Methods: Records were obtained from a systematic search of five biomedical research databases. The authors developed ecologically relevant potency (percent THC) exposure-comparison categories (1%-9%, 10%-19%, 20%-30%, kief/resin [ approximately 30%-50%], concentrates [>/=60%]) and used a landmark scientific report on cannabis and cannabinoids to determine outcome eligibility. Two reviewers independently conducted article screening and selection, extraction, and quality assessment. Findings were synthesized using both quantitative (association direction, binomial test) and narrative approaches. Certainty in the evidence was determined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Results: Of 4,545 screened records, 42 were eligible. Most studies addressed outcomes in the mental health, "problem" cannabis use, and other substance use domains. Findings in the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with higher-potency cannabis use. Findings were less consistent in other domains but tended to favor poorer outcomes with higher-potency use. Therapeutic outcomes were limited and mixed. Overall, certainty in the evidence was "very low." Conclusions: Findings within the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with high-potency use. Research is largely limited to cross-sectional studies spanning few adverse health domains, underscoring the need for prospective studies probing therapeutic, cardiorespiratory, cancer, and pre- and perinatal outcomes. Policies to curb high-potency cannabis use may be warranted while the evidence base improves.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius