Psychosis Risk
Study register · detail Systematic Review · Psychosis Risk · 2026

Multi-dimensional recovery trajectories in cannabis-induced psychosis: A systematic review examining symptomatic, functional, cognitive, and subjective outcomes.

No direction reported GRADE High 0 citations
Samplek = 33 Studien
n = 18.117 Pat.
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding

50 to 70 percent achieved symptomatic remission within six months, but functional recovery was inconsistent; continued cannabis use was the strongest predictor of unfavorable courses.

Summary

Systematic review on cannabis-induced psychosis across k=33 studies (n=18.117, mean follow-up 24 months). While 50–70% achieved symptomatic remission within 6 months, functional recovery showed substantial heterogeneity with frequent symptom-function dissociation. Continued cannabis use was the strongest predictor of poor outcomes across all domains (persistence rate 35–65%); abstinence was associated with significant benefits (functional recovery effect size 1.26). Only 15% of studies used person-centered trajectory modeling, which identified five distinct recovery profiles.

P
PopulationAdults with cannabis-induced or cannabis-associated first-episode psychosis, n=18.117 pooled from 33 longitudinal studies
O
Outcome50-70% symptomatic remission within 6 months, but functional recovery highly heterogeneous with frequent symptom-function dissociation; continued cannabis use predicts poor outcomes (persistence rate 35-65%), cannabis cessation shows significant benefit (functional recovery ES=1,26)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size
Citations / year
Authors
Ricci V, Sarni A, Barresi M, Remondino L, Maina G
DOI 10.1016/j.ajp.2026.104975
Design: Systematic Review
Share
Abstract
Background: Cannabis-induced psychotic disorders represent 12-35% of first-episode psychosis presentations globally. Traditional clinical wisdom holds these conditions carry favorable prognosis based on rapid symptomatic improvement, yet this narrative rests almost exclusively on symptomatic outcomes, overlooking functional, cognitive, and subjective recovery dimensions. Objective: To systematically review multi-dimensional recovery trajectories following cannabis-induced or cannabis-associated first-episode psychosis, characterizing patterns of concordance and discordance across outcome domains and identifying predictors of recovery profiles. Methods: We searched five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) from inception to December 2024. Inclusion Criteria: longitudinal studies (>/=6 months follow-up) assessing >/= 2 outcome domains among symptomatic, functional, cognitive, and subjective recovery in cannabis-induced first-episode psychosis. Two independent reviewers screened studies and assessed quality using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirty-three studies encompassing 18,117 participants were included (mean follow-up 24 months, range 6 months-10 years). While 50-70% achieved symptomatic remission within 6 months, functional recovery revealed substantial heterogeneity and frequent symptom-function dissociation. Continued cannabis use emerged as strongest predictor of poor outcomes across domains (persistence rates 35-65%), though cessation demonstrated significant benefits (functional recovery effect size 1.26). Cognitive findings were heterogeneous, and subjective outcomes remained poorly characterized (assessed in only 38% of studies). Only 15% of studies employed person-centered trajectory modeling, revealing five distinct recovery profiles. Conclusions: Symptomatic improvement frequently fails to translate into functional recovery following cannabis-induced psychosis. The field's understanding of "favorable prognosis" inadequately captures comprehensive multi-dimensional recovery, necessitating interventions targeting functional, cognitive, and subjective domains beyond symptomatic remission.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius