Study register · detailMeta-Analyse · Psychosis · 2018
Meta-analysis of neurocognition in young psychosis patients with current cannabis use
Bogaty et al.·Journal of Psychiatric ResearchImpact 3.0
HarmGRADEHigh41 citations
Samplek = 14 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlNo cannabis use
EndpointNeurocognitive test…
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
”Key finding
Current cannabis users (CANN+) show poorer performance in several cognitive domains (premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition) compared to never-users (CANN-), with deterioration in older patients.
Summary
Meta-analysis across k=14 studies on neurocognition in young psychosis patients (mean age 15–45 years) with current cannabis use (CANN+) vs. never-users (CANN-). CANN+ showed poorer performance in several domains: premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition. Higher age predicted poorer processing speed, sustained attention, verbal memory. CANN+ outperformed CANN- only in conceptual set-shifting. Random-effects modeling, moderator analyses.
P
PopulationYoung patients with psychotic disorders (mean age 15–45 years), cannabis users (CANN+) vs. never-users (CANN-)
I
InterventionCurrent cannabis use in psychosis patients
C
ControlNo cannabis use (CANN-)
O
OutcomeCANN+ showed poorer performance in premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory and motor inhibition; better performance in conceptual set-shifting; age moderation varied depending on cognitive domain
Confidence in the evidence
Very lowLowModerateHigh
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Objective: Adult psychosis patients (i.e. over the age of 25 years) who are also lifetime cannabis users (CANN+/-) appear to exhibit superior cognition compared to never-using patients (CANN-). The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the cognitive differences between CANN- and patients who currently use cannabis (CANN+) (i.e. during the CANN+/- patients' cannabis-using stage). Specifically, focusing on young patients under the age of 25 years, the typical stage of both psychosis- and cannabis-onset.
Method: Of the 308 studies identified through database searches and secondary referencing, 14 compared neurocognition of CANN+ and CANN- in young people with psychotic disorders (mean age between 15 and 45 years). Effect sizes were extracted using neurocognitive test performance between CANN+ and CANN- and random effects modelling was conducted on pooled ES and moderator analyses.
Results: CANN+ performed worse on several cognitive domains (i.e. premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition) compared to CANN-. The association between age and performance in CANN+ cognition was varied, with older age predictive of worse performance in processing speed, sustained attention, verbal memory, and better performance in verbal learning and very fluency. Of note, CANN+ outperformed CANN- in tests of conceptual set-shifting.
Conclusion: These results are consistent with previous findings indicating that CANN+ demonstrate poorer neurocognition than CANN-; and that this is exacerbated with increasing age. Our findings demonstrate significant cognitive differences between patients with CANN+ versus CANN- even at early-onset psychosis, which could suggest a different underlying mechanism towards psychosis for cannabis users.