Psychosis
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Psychosis · 2018

Meta-analysis of neurocognition in young psychosis patients with current cannabis use

Harm GRADE High 41 citations
Samplek = 14 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlNo cannabis use
EndpointNeurocognitive test…
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding

Current cannabis users (CANN+) show poorer performance in several cognitive domains (premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition) compared to never-users (CANN-), with deterioration in older patients.

Summary

Meta-analysis across k=14 studies on neurocognition in young psychosis patients (mean age 15–45 years) with current cannabis use (CANN+) vs. never-users (CANN-). CANN+ showed poorer performance in several domains: premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition. Higher age predicted poorer processing speed, sustained attention, verbal memory. CANN+ outperformed CANN- only in conceptual set-shifting. Random-effects modeling, moderator analyses.

P
PopulationYoung patients with psychotic disorders (mean age 15–45 years), cannabis users (CANN+) vs. never-users (CANN-)
I
InterventionCurrent cannabis use in psychosis patients
C
ControlNo cannabis use (CANN-)
O
OutcomeCANN+ showed poorer performance in premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory and motor inhibition; better performance in conceptual set-shifting; age moderation varied depending on cognitive domain
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Authors
Bogaty S E, Lee R S, Hickie I B et al.
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.01.010
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
Objective: Adult psychosis patients (i.e. over the age of 25 years) who are also lifetime cannabis users (CANN+/-) appear to exhibit superior cognition compared to never-using patients (CANN-). The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the cognitive differences between CANN- and patients who currently use cannabis (CANN+) (i.e. during the CANN+/- patients' cannabis-using stage). Specifically, focusing on young patients under the age of 25 years, the typical stage of both psychosis- and cannabis-onset. Method: Of the 308 studies identified through database searches and secondary referencing, 14 compared neurocognition of CANN+ and CANN- in young people with psychotic disorders (mean age between 15 and 45 years). Effect sizes were extracted using neurocognitive test performance between CANN+ and CANN- and random effects modelling was conducted on pooled ES and moderator analyses. Results: CANN+ performed worse on several cognitive domains (i.e. premorbid IQ, current IQ, verbal learning, verbal working memory, motor inhibition) compared to CANN-. The association between age and performance in CANN+ cognition was varied, with older age predictive of worse performance in processing speed, sustained attention, verbal memory, and better performance in verbal learning and very fluency. Of note, CANN+ outperformed CANN- in tests of conceptual set-shifting. Conclusion: These results are consistent with previous findings indicating that CANN+ demonstrate poorer neurocognition than CANN-; and that this is exacerbated with increasing age. Our findings demonstrate significant cognitive differences between patients with CANN+ versus CANN- even at early-onset psychosis, which could suggest a different underlying mechanism towards psychosis for cannabis users.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius