Psychosis
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse (Bayesian Model-Averaged) · Psychosis · 2025

The association between cannabis use and paranoia: Meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies

Clear benefit GRADE High 3 citations
Samplek = 13 Studien
n = 13.559 Pat.
ControlPlacebo / Non-users
EndpointParanoid symptoms
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse (Bayesian Model-Averaged)
Key finding

Cannabinoids are associated with significantly increased paranoid symptoms, with consistent effects in experimental and population-based studies.

Summary

Bayesian meta-analysis across k=13 studies (n=13.559) on cannabis and paranoid symptoms; experimental studies (k=5): cannabinoid participants developed more severe paranoid symptoms than placebo (SMD=0.47, 95% CI 0.13–0.48, PPI=94%); cross-sectional studies (k=4): cannabis users higher odds for paranoia (OR=1.75, 95% CI 1.43–2.07, PPI=99%); prospective studies (k=3) show association with later paranoia onset.

P
PopulationAdults from general population, clinical populations and experimental samples; pooled n=13.559
I
InterventionCannabinoids (THC-prevalent, THC-CBD-mixed, CBD-prevalent; experimental and observational)
C
ControlPlacebo (experimental studies) / Non-users (observational studies)
O
OutcomeExperimental: SMD=0,47 (95% CI 0,13–0,48, PPI 94%) for stronger paranoid symptoms under cannabinoids vs. placebo; cross-sectional: OR=1,75 (95% CI 1,43–2,07, PPI 99%) for paranoid symptoms in users vs. non-users; prospective studies confirm temporal association
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Belvederi Murri M, Catania S, Centra S, Folesani F, Muscettola A, Zerbinati L, Toffanin T, Ferrara M, Ossola P, Rossi R, Jannini T, Caruso R, Nanni MG, Grassi L
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106269
Design: Meta-Analyse (Bayesian Model-Averaged)
Share

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius