Study register · detail
Harm
GRADE
High
5 citations
SampleMeta-Analyse
Durationunclear
ControlHealthy control persons
EndpointCognitive domains
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding
Cannabis use disorder is associated with small to moderate cognitive impairments in 10 of 13 cognitive domains, particularly in verbal learning/memory, processing speed and working memory.
Summary
Meta-analysis on cognitive deficits in Cannabis Use Disorder. Small-to-moderate impairments in 10 of 13 cognitive domains; most affected: verbal learning/memory, processing speed and working memory (d=0.4-0.5). Verbal fluency and attention least impaired. No association between potential moderators and global cognition.
P
PopulationAdults with Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) diagnosis, pooled across multiple studies
I
InterventionCannabis Use Disorder (exposure/diagnosis)
C
ControlHealthy control persons (implicit, from primary studies)
O
OutcomeSmall to moderate impairments in 10 of 13 cognitive domains; most pronounced deficits in verbal learning/memory, processing speed and working memory (d = 0,4–0,5)
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
—
Blinding
—
Effect size
Harm
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background And Aims: Impairments in cognition are frequently associated with acute cannabis consumption; on the other hand, controversies persist regarding the residual cognitive impairments of cannabis, with some estimates highlighting significant or mild cognitive impairment. One of the main limitations of the available research syntheses is that little attention has been paid to individuals with cannabis use disorder. Thus, our main objectives are to determine the amplitude of the cognitive deficits associated with cannabis use disorder, and to identify the cognitive domains the most and least impaired.
Methods: Studies with a patient group with a cannabis use disorder diagnosis and data from at least one validated neurocognitive test were selected. After manual extraction, data were pooled in a multivariate meta-analysis and effect size estimates were calculated for 13 cognitive domains. Meta-regression analyses on potential moderators were performed.
Findings: There were small-to-moderate impairments in 10 out of the 13 cognitive domains. Deficits in verbal learning/memory, speed of processing and working memory were more prominent (d = 0.4/0.5) whereas verbal fluency and attention were the least affected. No association was observed between the potential moderators and global cognition.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that cannabis use disorder is associated with moderate deficits in verbal learning/memory, speed of processing and working memory. Despite the limitation of the studies in the field, our results should serve as a reminder that the residual cognitive impairments associated with cannabis should not be under-estimated prematurely.
The impediment to action advances action.