Psychosis Risk
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Psychosis Risk · 2020

Cannabis use in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: a comprehensive review.

No benefit demonstrated GRADE High 48 citations
Samplek = 36 Studien
DurationPublications up to November 2018
EndpointTransition to psychosis
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding

Cannabis use was not significantly associated with transition to psychosis (RR = 1,11, 95% CI = 0,89-1,37); limited evidence for other outcomes.

Summary

Systematic review on cannabis in clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, k=36 studies. Lifetime cannabis prevalence 48,7%, current use 25,8%, cannabis use disorder 14,9%. Pooled relative risk for psychosis transition RR=1,11 (95% CI 0,89–1,37, not significant). All cannabis prevalences with high heterogeneity (I²=75,7–92,8%).

P
PopulationPeople with clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR), pooled sample from 36 studies, mean age 20,1 years, 58,4% male
I
InterventionCannabis use (various patterns of use: lifetime use, current use, cannabis use disorder)
O
OutcomeLifetime prevalence of cannabis use 48,7%; current use 25,8%; cannabis use disorder 14,9%; pooled relative risk for transition to psychosis RR=1,11 (95% CI 0,89–1,37), not significant; heterogeneity 75,7–92,8%
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Farris MS, Shakeel MK, Addington J
DOI 10.1007/s00127-019-01810-x
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
Purpose: The objectives of this review were to understand the prevalence of cannabis use and how cannabis is associated with transition to psychosis, symptoms, cognition, trauma and family history in clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis individuals. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted to find studies that examined cannabis use in CHR individuals, with no limitations on the geographical area, and included publications up to November 2018. Studies were screened for inclusion based on detailed criteria, and data were extracted on cannabis use and associated outcomes. A quantitative synthesis by meta-analysis was performed where appropriate, otherwise, a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Results: Overall, 36 studies met inclusion criteria with an average age of 20.1 years and 58.4% males. Prevalence of lifetime cannabis use was 48.7%, whereas current cannabis use was 25.8% and the prevalence of cannabis use disorder/abuse or dependence was 14.9% across the studies. All cannabis use results had statistically significant heterogeneity ranging from 75.7 to 92.8%. The most commonly reported association with cannabis use was transition to psychosis, although the pooled relative risk (RR) was not statistically significant (RR = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-1.37). For all other outcomes including symptoms, cognition, trauma, and family history, the evidence was limited, and therefore, the results were synthesized qualitatively. Conclusion: Almost half of CHR individuals have ever used cannabis. However, cannabis use has not been thoroughly researched regarding frequency and dose of use, and how other factors, such as symptoms, are associated with cannabis in CHR individuals.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius