Safety & Adverse Effects
Study register · detail Prospektive offene Kohortenstudie · Safety & Adverse Effects · 2018

Cannabidiol for treating drug-resistant epilepsy in children: the New South Wales experience.

Mixed GRADE Very low 41 citations
Samplen = 40 Pat.
Durationup to 12 weeks
EndpointAdverse events
Blindingn.a.
DesignProspektive offene Kohortenstudie
Cannabinoidcbd
Key finding

Cannabidiol showed a manageable side-effect profile with subjective benefit in a proportion of children, but also relevant adverse events such as somnolence and elevated liver values.

Summary

n=40 children with severe pharmacoresistant epilepsy (NSW Compassionate Access Scheme), add-on CBD up to 25 mg/kg/day; 39/40 patients reported ≥1 adverse event; most common treatment-related ADR: somnolence (n=15, particularly with higher clobazam dose, spontaneous resolution in 10/15), gastrointestinal effects (7–9 patients each); 4 study discontinuations (including 1 elevated transaminases); caregiver global impression markedly/very markedly improved in 12/40 patients.

P
PopulationChildren with pharmacoresistant epilepsy and daily uncontrolled seizures (NSW Compassionate Access Scheme), n=40
I
InterventionCannabidiol as add-on antiepileptic drug, titrated up to max. 25 mg/kg/day, oral, up to 12 weeks
O
Outcome39/40 patients reported at least one adverse event; most common treatment-related AE: somnolence (n=15); 4 discontinuations (of which 1 elevated transaminases); parents reported 'marked/very marked improvement' in 12 children, clinicians in 7 children
Confidence in the evidence
Very low

The lowest GRADE level, the effect estimate remains uncertain.

Downgraded for
Risk of biasImprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Chen KA, Farrar M, Cardamone M, Gill D, Smith R, Cowell CT, Truong L, Lawson JA.
DOI 10.5694/mja18.00023
Design: Prospektive offene Kohortenstudie
Share
Abstract
<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the tolerability and safety of cannabidiol for treating drug-resistant epilepsy in children, and to describe adverse events associated with such treatment.<h4>Study design</h4>Prospective, open label cohort study.<h4>Setting</h4>Three tertiary NSW referral centres with paediatric neurology services.<h4>Participants</h4>First 40 children enrolled in the NSW Compassionate Access Scheme for children with drug-resistant epilepsy and uncountable daily seizures.<h4>Intervention</h4>Children received cannabidiol as an adjunct anti-epileptic drug, titrated to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day, for up to 12 weeks.<h4>Outcome measures</h4>Adverse events, withdrawals, and caregiver and physician Global Impression of Change assessments were recorded at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Seizure frequency could not be reliably recorded because of disease severity.<h4>Results</h4>Thirty-nine patients reported at least one adverse event; many were deemed unrelated to cannabidiol treatment. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was somnolence (15 participants), which resolved spontaneously in ten patients; it was particularly frequent in patients taking higher clobazam doses. Gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea) were each reported by seven to nine participants. Four children were withdrawn from treatment, including one with elevated transaminase levels. The caregivers of 12 children felt the overall health of their children had much or very much improved; clinicians assessed seven children as being much or very much improved.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Cannabidiol as an adjunct treatment had some subjective benefit for overall health, with a manageable adverse event profile. Monitoring changes in liver function and awareness of potential drug interactions is essential. Whether the reported benefit is attributable to cannabidiol cannot be established in an open label study of participants with severe intractable epilepsy.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius