Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
High
5 citations
SampleSystematische Review
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo and conventional antiemetics
EndpointAbsence of nausea and vomiting
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignSystematische Review
Cannabinoidthc
Key finding
Cannabinoids were more effective against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting than placebo and slightly better than conventional antiemetics.
Summary
Systematic review on cannabinoids in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); vs. placebo: absence of vomiting in 3 RCTs (n=168), absence of nausea+vomiting in 3 RCTs (n=288); vs. conventional antiemetics: no nausea in 5 RCTs (n=258), no vomiting in 4 RCTs (n=209). Cannabinoids more effective than placebo and slightly superior to conventional antiemetics; pediatric data for nabilone/dronabinol as adjuvant antiemetics also reported.
P
PopulationCancer patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), incl. pediatric patients; pooled participant numbers vary by comparison (max. n=414)
I
InterventionCannabinoids (nabilone, dronabinol, delta-9-THC, delta-8-THC, cannabis preparations with THC/CBD)
C
ControlPlacebo and conventional antiemetics
O
OutcomeCannabinoids more effective than placebo (absence of vomiting: 3 studies, n=168; absence of nausea and vomiting: 3 studies, n=288) and slightly better than conventional antiemetics (absence of nausea: 5 studies, n=258)
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
—
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Patients suffering from malignant diseases receive very often highly emetogenic chemotherapy as part of their treatment. With the aim of assessing the efficacy of cannabinoids in treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), we searched the literature published until April 2020 in Medline/PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and in specific web pages. Randomized clinical trials comparing cannabinoids efficacy in managing CINV with that of placebo reported absence of vomiting (3 trials, 168 patients) and absence of nausea and vomiting (3 trials, 288 participants). In comparison with patients receiving other antiemetics, patients receiving cannabinoids reported no nausea (5 trials, 258 participants), no vomiting (4 trials, 209 participants), and absence of both (4 trials, 414 patients). Across all trials, cannabinoids were more effective in relieving the symptoms of nausea and vomiting induced by cytotoxic therapy than placebo was and slightly better than conventional antiemetics. A retrospective review comparing nabilone, dronabinol, delta-9-THC, and delta 8-THC with other antiemetics used to manage CINV in pediatric patients showed that these drugs could also be used as adjuvant antiemetics. Cancer patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy but with insufficiently effective standard antiemetic therapy can be given cannabis preparations containing similar amounts of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, which should be received in strict compliance with the professional guidelines for the treatment of CINV.
The impediment to action advances action.