Neuropathic Pain
Study register · detail RCT (parallel, 4-arm) · Neuropathic Pain · 2023

Cannabis-Based Medicine for Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity-A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

No benefit demonstrated GRADE High 27 citations
Samplen = 134 Pat.
Duration6 weeks treatment, 1 week…
ControlPlacebo, 6 weeks
EndpointNRS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (parallel, 4-arm)
Cannabinoidkombination
Max. dose67.5 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

THC, CBD and their combination did not significantly reduce neuropathic pain or spasticity compared with placebo.

Summary

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 4-arm study (n=134; MS n=119, SCI n=15): THC, CBD, THC+CBD vs. placebo over 6 weeks in central neuropathic pain and/or spasticity. No significant difference in mean pain intensity score (THC: Δ0,42 [95% CI −0,54 to 1,38]; CBD: Δ0,45 [−0,47 to 1,38]; THC+CBD: Δ0,16 [−0,75 to 1,08]) compared with placebo. No effect could be demonstrated for spasticity and secondary outcomes either.

P
PopulationAdults with MS or spinal cord injury and central neuropathic pain (NRS >3–≤9) and/or spasticity (NRS >3), n=134 (MS n=119, SCI n=15)
I
InterventionTHC (max. 22,5 mg/day), CBD (max. 45 mg/day) or THC+CBD (max. 22,5/45 mg/day), oral, 6 weeks
C
ControlPlacebo, 6 weeks
O
OutcomeNo significant difference in mean pain intensity (THC: 0,42; CBD: 0,45; THC+CBD: 0,16 vs. placebo) or spasticity intensity (THC: 0,24; CBD: 0,46; THC+CBD: 0,10 vs. placebo); all 95% CI include zero
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Hansen JS, Gustavsen S, Roshanisefat H, Kant M, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersen C, Olsson A, Chow HH, Asgari N, Hansen JR, Nielsen HH, Hansen RM, Petersen T, Oturai AB, Sellebjerg F, Sædder EA, Kasch H, Rasmussen PV, Finnerup NB, Svendsen KB.
DOI 10.3390/ph16081079
Design: RCT (parallel, 4-arm)
Share
Abstract
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly sustain central neuropathic pain (NP) and spasticity. Despite a lack of consistent evidence, cannabis-based medicine (CBM) has been suggested as a supplement treatment. We aimed to investigate the effect of CBM on NP and spasticity in patients with MS or SCI. We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in Denmark. Patients aged ≥18 years with NP (intensity >3, ≤9 on a numerical rating scale (NRS0-10) and/or spasticity (>3 on NRS0-10) were randomized to treatment consisting of either delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), a combination of THC&CBD in maximum doses of 22.5 mg, 45 mg and 22.5/45 mg per day, respectively, or placebo. A baseline registration was performed before randomization. Treatment duration was six weeks followed by a one-week phaseout. Primary endpoints were the intensity of patient-reported NP and/or spasticity. Between February 2019 and December 2021, 134 patients were randomized (MS <i>n</i> = 119, SCI <i>n</i> = 15), where 32 were assigned to THC, 31 to CBD, 31 to THC&CBD, and 40 to placebo. No significant difference was found for: mean pain intensity (THC 0.42 (-0.54-1.38), CBD 0.45 (-0.47-1.38) and THC&CBD 0.16 (-0.75-1.08)), mean spasticity intensity (THC 0.24 (-0.67-1.45), CBD 0.46 (-0.74-1.65), and THC&CBD 0.10 (-1.18-1.39), secondary outcomes (patient global impression of change and quality of life), or any tertiary outcomes. We aimed to include 448 patients in the trial; however, due to COVID-19 and recruitment challenges, fewer were included. Nevertheless, in this four-arm parallel trial, no effect was found between placebo and active treatment with THC or CBD alone or in combination on NP or spasticity in patients with either MS or SCI. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT (2018-002315-98).

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius