Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
90 citations
Samplek = 11 Reviews
DurationJanuary 2009 to January 2017
ControlPlacebo
EndpointPain intensity
Blindingunklar
DesignUmbrella Review (SR of SRs)
THC:CBD1:1
Key finding
Limited evidence for benefit of THC/CBD spray in neuropathic pain; insufficient evidence for cannabinoids in cancer, rheumatic or gastrointestinal pain; associated with CNS and psychiatric adverse effects.
Summary
Umbrella review of k=11 systematic reviews (3 of high, 8 of moderate methodological quality) on cannabinoids in pain therapy and palliative care. For neuropathic pain: limited evidence for THC/CBD spray; insufficient evidence for other cannabinoids (dronabinol, nabilone, medical cannabis) in cancer pain, rheumatic/gastrointestinal pain or anorexia.
P
PopulationAdults with chronic pain (neuropathic, cancer, rheumatic, gastrointestinal) as well as anorexia in cancer/AIDS in palliative care
I
InterventionCannabinoids (THC/CBD spray, dronabinol, nabilone, medical cannabis)
C
ControlPlacebo (within the included RCTs)
O
OutcomeLimited evidence for benefit of THC/CBD spray in neuropathic pain; insufficient evidence for cannabinoids in cancer pain, rheumatic/gastrointestinal pain and anorexia; CNS and psychiatric adverse effects documented
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: There are conflicting interpretations of the evidence regarding the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids in pain management and palliative medicine.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review (SR) of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective long-term observational studies of the use of cannabinoids in pain management and palliative medicine. Pertinent publications from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrieved by a selective search in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Medline. The methodological quality of the SRs was assessed with the AMSTAR instrument, and the clinical relevance of quantitative data syntheses was assessed according to the standards of the Cochrane Collaboration.
Results: Of the 750 publications identified, 11 SRs met the inclusion criteria; 3 of them were of high and 8 of moderate methodological quality. 2 prospective long-term observational studies with medical cannabis and 1 with tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol spray (THC/CBD spray) were also analyzed. There is limited evidence for a benefit of THC/CBD spray in the treatment of neuropathic pain. There is inadequate evidence for any benefit of cannabinoids (dronabinol, nabilone, medical cannabis, or THC/CBD spray) to treat cancer pain, pain of rheumatic or gastrointestinal origin, or anorexia in cancer or AIDS. Treatment with cannabis-based medicines is associated with central nervous and psychiatric side effects.
Conclusion: The public perception of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabis-based medicines in pain management and palliative medicine conflicts with the findings of systematic reviews and prospective observational studies conducted according to the standards of evidence-based medicine.
The impediment to action advances action.