Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Low
92 citations
Samplen = 4.561 Pat.
DurationAge 16 to age 18
ControlNo cannabis use
EndpointDepression and anxiety
Blindingn.a.
DesignProspektive Kohortenstudie
Key finding
Cannabis use shows only weak association with depression after adjustment; association with anxiety disappears after confounder control.
Summary
ALSPAC cohort study (n=4.561); cannabis use at 16 years → increased odds for depression at 18 years (unadjusted OR=1.50, 95%-CI 1.26–1.80); after full adjustment for confounders weak association persisted (OR=1.30, 95%-CI 0.98–1.72). No significant association with anxiety after confounder adjustment.
P
PopulationAdolescents from the British ALSPAC birth cohort study, n=4561, age 16 (exposure) and 18 years (outcome)
I
InterventionCannabis and cigarette use at age 16
C
ControlNo cannabis use (reference group); parallel comparison with cigarette use
O
OutcomeCannabis use unadjusted increased the odds for depression (OR 1,50; 95%-CI 1,26–1,80); after full adjustment weak evidence persisted (OR 1,30; 95%-CI 0,98–1,72). Cigarette use showed no significant association with depression after adjustment (OR 0,97; 95%-CI 0,75–1,24). No association of either substance with anxiety disorders after adjustment.
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>Substance use is associated with common mental health disorders, but the causal effect of specific substances is uncertain. We investigate whether adolescent cannabis and cigarette use is associated with incident depression and anxiety, while attempting to account for confounding and reverse causation.<h4>Methods</h4>We used data from ALSPAC, a UK birth cohort study, to investigate associations between cannabis or cigarettes (measured at age 16) and depression or anxiety (measured at age 18), before and after adjustment for pre-birth, childhood and adolescent confounders. Our imputed sample size was 4561 participants.<h4>Results</h4>Both cannabis (unadjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.26, 1.80) and cigarette use (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16, 1.61) increased the odds of developing depression. Adjustment for pre-birth and childhood confounders partly attenuated these relationships though strong evidence of association persisted for cannabis use. There was weak evidence of association for cannabis (fully adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.98, 1.72) and insufficient evidence for association for cigarette use (fully adjusted OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.75, 1.24) after mutually adjusting for each other, or for alcohol or other substance use. Neither cannabis nor cigarette use were associated with anxiety after adjustment for pre-birth and childhood confounders.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Whilst evidence of association between cannabis use and depression persisted after adjusting for pre-term and childhood confounders, our results highlight the difficulties in trying to estimate and interpret independent effects of cannabis and tobacco on psychopathology. Complementary methods are required to robustly examine effects of cannabis and tobacco on psychopathology.
The impediment to action advances action.