Multiple Sclerosis
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Multiple Sclerosis · 2014

Summary of evidence-based guideline: complementary and alternative medicine in multiple sclerosis: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Mixed GRADE High 183 citations
SampleMeta-Analyse
DurationLiterature search…
ControlPlacebo
EndpointSpasticity, pain, other MS…
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Key finding

Cannabinoids show possible benefit for spasticity and pain (Level B), but are probably ineffective for objective spasticity and tremor; other CAM interventions show predominantly little or no efficacy.

Summary

Evidence-based guideline of the American Academy of Neurology on complementary/alternative therapies in MS (literature 1970–2013). Oral cannabis extract: Level A for spasticity symptoms and pain (except central neuropathic pain); THC: Level B for spasticity symptoms/pain; nabiximols (Sativex): Level B for spasticity symptoms, pain, urinary frequency. Cannabinoids probably ineffective for objective spasticity (short-term)/tremor (Level B), probably ineffective for urinary incontinence (Level B). Warning regarding adverse effects and quality control for non-standardized extracts.

P
PopulationAdults with multiple sclerosis (MS)
I
InterventionComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) incl. oral cannabis extract, THC, nabiximols (Sativex), magnet therapy, fish oil, ginkgo biloba, reflexology, among others
C
ControlPlacebo (in included studies)
O
OutcomeLevel A for oral cannabis extract for spasticity/pain; Level B for THC and nabiximols for spasticity/pain; probably ineffective for objective spasticity/tremor (Level B); various levels of evidence for other CAM interventions
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Yadav V, Bever C Jr, Bowen J, Bowling A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Cameron M, Bourdette D, Gronseth GS, Narayanaswami P
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000000250
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
Objective: To develop evidence-based recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We searched the literature (1970-March 2011; March 2011-September 2013 MEDLINE search), classified articles, and linked recommendations to evidence. Results And Recommendations: Clinicians might offer oral cannabis extract for spasticity symptoms and pain (excluding central neuropathic pain) (Level A). Clinicians might offer tetrahydrocannabinol for spasticity symptoms and pain (excluding central neuropathic pain) (Level B). Clinicians should counsel patients that these agents are probably ineffective for objective spasticity (short-term)/tremor (Level B) and possibly effective for spasticity and pain (long-term) (Level C). Clinicians might offer Sativex oromucosal cannabinoid spray (nabiximols) for spasticity symptoms, pain, and urinary frequency (Level B). Clinicians should counsel patients that these agents are probably ineffective for objective spasticity/urinary incontinence (Level B). Clinicians might choose not to offer these agents for tremor (Level C). Clinicians might counsel patients that magnetic therapy is probably effective for fatigue and probably ineffective for depression (Level B); fish oil is probably ineffective for relapses, disability, fatigue, MRI lesions, and quality of life (QOL) (Level B); ginkgo biloba is ineffective for cognition (Level A) and possibly effective for fatigue (Level C); reflexology is possibly effective for paresthesia (Level C); Cari Loder regimen is possibly ineffective for disability, symptoms, depression, and fatigue (Level C); and bee sting therapy is possibly ineffective for relapses, disability, fatigue, lesion burden/volume, and health-related QOL (Level C). Cannabinoids may cause adverse effects. Clinicians should exercise caution regarding standardized vs nonstandardized cannabis extracts and overall CAM quality control/nonregulation. Safety/efficacy of other CAM/CAM interaction with MS disease-modifying therapies is unknown.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius