Cancer
Study register · detail Phase-II/III RCT (randomisiert, placebokontrolliert, multizentrisch) · Cancer · 2024

Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial

Clear benefit GRADE High 25 citations
Samplen = 147 Pat.
DurationDays -1 to 5
ControlPlacebo capsule in addition to standard…
EndpointComplete response rate
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignPhase-II/III RCT (randomisiert, placebokontrolliert, multizentrisch)
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Max. dose22.5 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

THC:CBD improved the complete response rate (no vomiting/retching and no rescue medication) from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, p=0,01) with similar effects on absence of significant nausea and improvement in quality of life, but with increased adverse events such as sedation, dizziness and transient anxiety.

Summary

Phase II/III RCT (n=147); oral THC:CBD extract (2,5 mg THC + 2,5 mg CBD, 3×/day) vs. placebo as an addition to guideline antiemetic prophylaxis for refractory chemotherapy-related nausea/vomiting. Complete response rate rose from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI 4–28; p=0,01). More frequent adverse events: sedation (18% vs. 7%), dizziness (10% vs. 0%), transient anxiety (4% vs. 1%). No serious adverse events under THC:CBD.

P
PopulationAdults with refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting under moderately to highly emetogenic i.v. chemotherapy despite guideline-directed antiemesis, n=147
I
InterventionOral cannabis extract THC 2,5 mg + CBD 2,5 mg (capsule, 3×/day, day -1 to +5) as an addition to standard antiemesis
C
ControlPlacebo capsule (3×/day, same period) in addition to standard antiemesis
O
OutcomeComplete response rate (no vomiting/retching, no rescue medication, hours 0–120 after chemotherapy cycle A): 24% (THC:CBD) vs. 8% (placebo), absolute difference 16% (95% CI 4–28, p=0,01)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Grimison P, Mersiades A, Kirby A et al
DOI 10.1200/jco.23.01836
Design: Phase-II/III RCT (randomisiert, placebokontrolliert, multizentrisch)
Share
Abstract
The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of an oral cannabis extract in adults with refractory nausea and/or vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic, intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Here, we report results of the prespecified combined analysis including the initial phase II and subsequent phase III components. Study treatment consisted of oral capsules containing either tetrahydrocannabinol 2.5 mg plus cannabidiol 2.5 mg capsules (THC:CBD) or matching placebo, taken three times a day from days -1 to 5, in addition to guideline-consistent antiemetics. The primary measure of effect was the difference in the proportions of participants with no vomiting or retching and no use of rescue medications (a complete response) during hours 0-120 after the first cycle of chemotherapy on study (cycle A). We recruited 147 evaluable of a planned 250 participants from 2016 to 2022. Background antiemetic prophylaxis included a corticosteroid and 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in 97%, a neurokinin-1 antagonist in 80%, and olanzapine in 10%. THC:CBD compared with placebo improved the complete response rate from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI, 4 to 28,= .01), with similar effects for absence of significant nausea, use of rescue medications, daily vomits, and the nausea scale on the Functional Living Index-Emesis quality-of-life questionnaire. More frequent bothersome adverse events of special interest included sedation (18% vs 7%), dizziness (10% vs 0%), and transient anxiety (4% vs 1%). There were no serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD. THC:CBD is an effective adjunct for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, but was associated with additional adverse events.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius