Multiple Sclerosis
Study register · detail RCT (multizentrisches, doppelblindes, placebokontrolliertes Parallelgruppen-Design) · Multiple Sclerosis · 2010

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of Sativex, in subjects with symptoms of spasticity due to multiple sclerosis

Mixed GRADE High 277 citations
Samplen = 337 Pat.
Duration15 weeks
ControlPlacebo
EndpointNRS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (multizentrisches, doppelblindes, placebokontrolliertes Parallelgruppen-Design)
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Routeoromukosal
Key finding

ITT analysis showed non-significant improvement; per-protocol population (79%) showed significant superiority of Sativex over placebo for NRS score and responder analyses.

Summary

n=337 MS patients with treatment-resistant spasticity; 15-week DBRCT (multicenter), Sativex vs. placebo. Per-protocol population: NRS reduction -1,3 vs. -0,8 points (p=0,035); responder rate (≥30% improvement) 36% vs. 24% (p=0,040). Timed 10-metre walk test significantly improved (p=0,042); Sativex well tolerated, adverse effects predominantly mild to moderate.

P
PopulationAdults with MS-related spasticity, insufficiently controlled by existing antispasticity agents, n=337
I
InterventionSativex (THC:CBD oromucosal), self-titration over 15 weeks
C
ControlPlacebo (oromucosal)
O
OutcomeITT: non-significant NRS improvement favouring Sativex; PP analysis: NRS reduction −1,3 vs. −0,8 points (p=0,035), responder rate ≥30% improvement: 36% vs. 24% (p=0,040)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Collin C, Ehler E, Waberzinek G et al.
DOI 10.1179/016164109x12590518685660
Design: RCT (multizentrisches, doppelblindes, placebokontrolliertes Parallelgruppen-Design)
Share
Abstract
Muscle spasticity is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), occurring in more than 60% of patients. To compare Sativex with placebo in relieving symptoms of spasticity due to MS. A 15-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 337 subjects with MS spasticity not fully relieved with current anti-spasticity therapy. The primary endpoint was a spasticity 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a non-significant improvement in NRS score, in favor of Sativex. The per protocol (PP) population (79% of subjects) change in NRS score and responder analyses (> or =30% improvement from baseline) were both significantly superior for Sativex, compared with placebo: -1.3 versus -0.8 points (change from baseline, p=0.035); and 36% versus 24% (responders, p=0.040). These were supported by the time to response (ITT: p=0.068; PP: p=0.025) analyses, carer global impression of change assessment (p=0.013) and timed 10-meter walk (p=0.042). Among the subjects who achieved a > or =30% response in spasticity with Sativex, 98, 94 and 73% reported improvements of 10, 20 and 30%, respectively, at least once during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Sativex was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events reported being mild-to-moderate in severity. The 0-10 NRS and responder PP analyses demonstrated that Sativex treatment resulted in a significant reduction in treatment-resistant spasticity, in subjects with advanced MS and severe spasticity. The response observed within the first 4 weeks of treatment appears to be a useful aid to prediction of responder/non-responder status.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius