Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
0 citations
Samplek = 4 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo or baseline
EndpointNeuropathic pain
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose18.0 mg
Key finding
Three of four RCTs showed statistically significant pain reduction with cannabinoids vs. placebo, however one study showed no superiority.
Summary
Systematic review on medical cannabis in diabetic peripheral neuropathy; k=4 RCTs included. 3 of 4 studies showed statistically significant pain reduction vs. placebo; THC doses ~16–18 mg/day (vaporized/sublingual) were associated with clinically relevant pain relief. Side effects (dizziness, cognitive symptoms) mostly mild-moderate.
P
PopulationAdults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (painful form), n not reported pooled
I
InterventionMedical cannabis, isolated cannabinoids (THC vaporized/sublingual) or approved cannabis-based medicines as adjuvant
C
ControlPlacebo or baseline
O
Outcome3 of 4 RCTs showed statistically significant pain reduction with cannabinoids vs. placebo; THC doses of approx. 16–18 mg (vaporized/sublingual) associated with clinically meaningful pain relief; 1 RCT without superiority
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted specifically in participants with diabetes and painful peripheral neuropathy to assess the effectiveness and safety of medical cannabis, isolated cannabinoids, or nationally approved cannabis-based medicines as adjuvant treatment, compared with placebo or baseline.
Materials And Methods: Controlled clinical studies and RCTs in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were eligible. Animal and in vitro studies were excluded. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Scopus and screened 15,377 records; 35 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 4 RCTs were included in the qualitative synthesis.
Results: Three of four studies reported statistically significant reductions in neuropathic pain with cannabinoid-based interventions compared with placebo, whereas one trial did not demonstrate superiority. In two trials using vaporized or sublingual Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), doses in the range of approximately 16-18 mg were associated with clinically meaningful pain relief in participants. Adverse effects, including dizziness and cognitive symptoms, were common but generally mild-to-moderate, and discontinuations due to adverse effects varied across studies.
Discussion/Conclusion: Evidence from four small, heterogeneous RCTs suggests that cannabinoid-based therapies may reduce pain in some patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy; however, the limited number of studies, variability in formulations and comparators, and risk of bias preclude firm conclusions regarding efficacy. Observed THC doses around 16-18 mg/day delivered via vaporized or sublingual routes should be viewed as preliminary, hypothesis-generating ranges rather than definitive recommendations. Larger, contemporary RCTs with rigorous risk-of-bias control, standardized outcomes, and detailed safety reporting are needed.
The impediment to action advances action.