Multiple Sclerosis
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Multiple Sclerosis · 2010

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Sativex (nabiximols), on spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis.

Clear benefit GRADE High 151 citations
Samplek = 3 Studien
n = 666 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo
EndpointNRS/VAS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignMeta-Analyse
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Routeoromukosal
Key finding

Nabiximols showed a statistically significant reduction in spasticity versus placebo with a difference of -0,32 points on the numeric rating scale (p=0,026) and a higher responder rate (OR 1,62, p=0,0073).

Summary

Meta-analysis of k=3 randomised, placebo-controlled double-blind trials (n=666) on nabiximols (Sativex) for MS spasticity; NRS difference versus placebo -0,32 (95% CI -0,61 to -0,04; p=0,026); responder rate (≥30% improvement) OR=1,62 (95% CI 1,15–2,28; p=0,0073). Nabiximols well tolerated, adverse effects predominantly mild to moderate.

P
PopulationAdults with multiple sclerosis and spasticity, pooled n=666
I
InterventionNabiximols (Sativex), oromucosal spray, THC/CBD combination
C
ControlPlacebo
O
OutcomeMean NRS reduction: −1,30 (nabiximols) vs. −0,97 (placebo), difference −0,32 (95% CI −0,61; −0,04; p=0,026); responder rate OR=1,62 (95% CI 1,15–2,28; p=0,0073)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Wade DT, Collin C, Stott C, Duncombe P
DOI 10.1177/1352458510367462
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
To determine the efficacy of Sativex (USAN: nabiximols) in the alleviation of spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis. The results from three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel group studies were combined for analysis. 666 patients with multiple sclerosis and spasticity. A 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, transformed to a 0-10 scale) or a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0-10 NRS) was used to measure spasticity. Patients achieving a >/=30% improvement from baseline in their spasticity score were defined as 'responders'. Global impression of change (GIC) at the end of treatment was also recorded. The patient populations were similar. The adjusted mean change of the numerical rating scale from baseline in the treated group was -1.30 compared with -0.97 for placebo. Using a linear model, the treatment difference was -0.32 (95% CI -0.61, -0.04, p = 0.026). A statistically significant greater proportion of treated patients were responders (odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% CI 1.15, 2.28; p = 0.0073) and treated patients also reported greater improvement: odds ratio 1.67 (95% CI 1.05, 2.65; p = 0.030). High numbers of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, but most were mild to moderate in severity and all drug-related serious adverse events resolved. The meta-analysis demonstrates that nabiximols is well tolerated and reduces spasticity.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius