Study register · detailMeta-Analyse · Multiple Sclerosis · 2018
A mixed treatment comparison on efficacy and safety of treatments for spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Fu et al.·Clinical RehabilitationImpact 1.9
MixedGRADEHigh30 citations
Samplek = 23 Studien n = 2.720 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo and active comparators
EndpointProportion of improved…
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignMeta-Analyse
”Key finding
Cannabinoids and botulinum toxin showed better efficacy than placebo for spasticity due to multiple sclerosis, but cannabinoids and tizanidine caused significantly more mild adverse effects than placebo.
Summary
Systematic review + network meta-analysis on spasticity therapies in MS; k=23 RCTs, n=2.720. Cannabinoids and botulinum toxin significantly better improvement rate than placebo. Botulinum toxin also significantly better than tizanidine/baclofen. Cannabinoids, tizanidine, diazepam more frequent mild adverse effects than placebo. SUCRA: botulinum toxin optimal intervention, cannabinoids and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) also worth considering.
P
PopulationAdults with spasticity due to multiple sclerosis, pooled n=2720
I
InterventionCannabinoids (as well as botulinum toxin, tizanidine, baclofen, diazepam, TENS – network meta-analysis)
C
ControlPlacebo and active comparators (tizanidine, baclofen, among others)
O
OutcomeCannabinoids and botulinum toxin showed significantly better response rates than placebo; no significant difference in the spasticity scale; cannabinoids with significantly more mild adverse effects than placebo
Confidence in the evidence
Very lowLowModerateHigh
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Objectives: This study is aimed at providing a quantitative evaluation on different therapies of spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis.
Data Sources: PubMed and Embase database.
Review Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials that met the requirements. Percentages of improved patients' spasticity scale, mild adverse effect and severe adverse effect were extracted as outcomes. The forest plots accompanied with surface under the cumulative ranking curves were used to reveal the efficacy and safety of these therapies.
Results: In all, 23 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2720 patients were included in our study. Cannabinoids and botulinum toxin had shown a significantly better efficacy than placebo in the percentage of improved patients. Botulinum toxin also showed such significant difference compared with tizanidine and baclofen. No significant difference was found in spasticity scale. Cannabinoids, tizanidine and diazepam had significantly more mild adverse effect reports than placebo. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves suggested that cannabinoids, botulinum toxin and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation were preferable therapies.
Conclusions: We recommended botulinum toxin as the optimal intervention for multiple sclerosis-related spasticity. Cannabinoids and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation could also be considered as multiple sclerosis-related spasticity treatments but their safety remained to be verified.