Chronic Pain
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Chronic Pain · 2024

Cannabis for medical use versus opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Mixed GRADE High 44 citations
Samplek = 90 Studien
n = 22.028 Pat.
Duration28 to 180 days follow-up
ControlOpioids or placebo
EndpointVAS
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding

Cannabis and opioid show similar small pain improvements versus placebo; cannabis leads to fewer discontinuations due to side effects than opioid, but similar effectiveness for pain relief and sleep quality.

Summary

Network meta-analysis across k=90 RCTs (n=22.028) on cannabis vs. opioid for chronic non-malignant pain, follow-up 28-180 days. Moderate evidence: opioid small improvement in pain/function/sleep vs. placebo; cannabis similar effects vs. placebo. No difference cannabis vs. opioid for physical function (WMD 0,47 on SF-36 PCS, 95% CrI -1,97 to 2,99) or pain relief (WMD 0,23 cm on 10-cm VAS, 95% CrI -0,06 to 0,53); cannabis fewer treatment discontinuations due to side effects (OR 0,55, 95% CrI 0,36-0,83).

P
PopulationAdults with chronic non-cancer pain, pooled n=22.028
I
InterventionMedical cannabis (various types/routes of administration)
C
ControlOpioids or placebo
O
OutcomeNo significant difference between cannabis and opioids regarding pain reduction (WMD 0,23 cm on 10-cm VAS, 95%-CrI −0,06 to 0,53) or sleep quality; cannabis with fewer treatment-discontinuation-related adverse events than opioids (OR 0,55, 95%-CrI 0,36–0,83); moderate evidence for small improvements under opioids vs. placebo, low to moderate evidence for similar effects under cannabis vs. placebo
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Jeddi HM, Busse JW, Sadeghirad B, Levine M, Zoratti MJ, Wang L, Noori A, Couban RJ, Tarride JE
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068182
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative benefits and harms of opioids and cannabis for medical use for chronic non-cancer pain. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Cannabis-Med, Epistemonikos and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) from inception to March 2021. Study Selection: Randomised trials comparing any type of cannabis for medical use or opioids, against each other or placebo, with patient follow-up >/=4 weeks. Data Extraction And Synthesis: Paired reviewers independently extracted data. We used Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses to summarise the evidence and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence and communicate our findings. Results: Ninety trials involving 22 028 patients were eligible for review, among which the length of follow-up ranged from 28 to 180 days. Moderate certainty evidence showed that opioids provide small improvements in pain, physical functioning and sleep quality versus placebo; low to moderate certainty evidence supported similar effects for cannabis versus placebo. Neither was more effective than placebo for role, social or emotional functioning (all high to moderate certainty evidence). Moderate certainty evidence showed there is probably little to no difference between cannabis for medical use and opioids for physical functioning (weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.47 on the 100-point 36-item Short Form Survey physical component summary score, 95% credible interval (CrI) -1.97 to 2.99), and cannabis resulted in fewer discontinuations due to adverse events versus opioids (OR 0.55, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.83). Low certainty evidence suggested little to no difference between cannabis and opioids for pain relief (WMD 0.23 cm on a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 95% CrI -0.06 to 0.53) or sleep quality (WMD 0.49 mm on a 100 mm VAS, 95% CrI -4.72 to 5.59). Conclusions: Cannabis for medical use may be similarly effective and result in fewer discontinuations than opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020185184.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius