Chronic Pain
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse · Chronic Pain · 2022

Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review of non-randomised studies.

Harm GRADE High 62 citations
Samplek = 39 Studien
n = 12.143 Pat.
Duration≥4 weeks follow-up
EndpointPrevalence of adverse events
Blindingunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding

Adverse events are common (26,0%), especially psychiatric side effects (13,5%), but serious side effects occur in fewer than 1 in 20 patients.

Summary

Systematic review on long-term side effects of medical cannabis in chronic pain; k=39 studies, n=12.143 adult patients. Very low evidence certainty: Adverse events common (26,0%; 95% CI 13,2%–41,2%), especially psychiatric events (13,5%; 95% CI 2,6%–30,6%). Serious side effects, discontinuation due to side effects, cognitive impairment and dependence each in <5% of patients. Studies with ≥24 weeks follow-up showed more adverse events than shorter studies (interaction p<0,01).

P
PopulationAdults (and children) with chronic pain, n=12.143, from 39 non-randomised studies
I
InterventionMedical cannabis or cannabinoids (various forms), duration of use ≥4 weeks
O
OutcomeFrequency of adverse events: 26,0% (95% CI 13,2%–41,2%); psychiatric ADRs 13,5% (95% CI 2,6%–30,6%); serious ADRs, cognitive ADRs, dependence/withdrawal each <5%; more ADRs with study duration ≥24 weeks (interaction test p<0,01)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Harm
Citations / year
Authors
Zeraatkar D, Cooper MA, Agarwal A, Vernooij RWM, Leung G, Loniewski K, Dookie JE, Ahmed MM, Hong BY, Hong C
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054282
Design: Meta-Analyse
Share
Abstract
Objective: To establish the prevalence of long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL from inception to 1 April 2020. Study Selection: Non-randomised studies reporting on harms of medical cannabis or cannabinoids in adults or children living with chronic pain with >/=4 weeks of follow-up. Data Extraction And Synthesis: A parallel guideline panel provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of adverse events for consideration. Two reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, screened the search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses and the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Results: We identified 39 eligible studies that enrolled 12 143 adult patients with chronic pain. Very low certainty evidence suggests that adverse events are common (prevalence: 26.0%; 95% CI 13.2% to 41.2%) among users of medical cannabis for chronic pain, particularly any psychiatric adverse events (prevalence: 13.5%; 95% CI 2.6% to 30.6%). Very low certainty evidence, however, indicates serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, cognitive adverse events, accidents and injuries, and dependence and withdrawal syndrome are less common and each typically occur in fewer than 1 in 20 patients. We compared studies with <24 weeks and >/=24 weeks of cannabis use and found more adverse events reported among studies with longer follow-up (test for interaction p<0.01). Palmitoylethanolamide was usually associated with few to no adverse events. We found insufficient evidence addressing the harms of medical cannabis compared with other pain management options, such as opioids. Conclusions: There is very low certainty evidence that adverse events are common among people living with chronic pain who use medical cannabis or cannabinoids, but that few patients experience serious adverse events.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius