Multiple Sclerosis
Study register · detail Systematic Review · Multiple Sclerosis · 2023

Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Mixed GRADE Moderate 237 citations
Samplek = 101 Studien
n = 7 Pat.
Durationup to 9 February 2022
ControlPlacebo or control groups
EndpointEfficacy and safety
Blindingn.a.
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding

Cannabis and cannabinoids show mixed effects: cannabidiol effective in epilepsy, cannabis-based medicines effective in MS and chronic pain but with substantial adverse effects; cannabis worsens psychotic symptoms in the general population and causes harm in pregnancy and driving.

Summary

Umbrella review of k=101 meta-analyses (50 observational, 51 RCTs) on cannabis/cannabinoids. For MS spasticity: cannabis-based medicines improved spasticity (GRADE=moderate), but increased psychiatric and gastrointestinal adverse effects as well as somnolence. CNS adverse effects: OR=2,84 (95% CI 2,16–3,73), psychiatric effects: OR=3,07 (1,79–5,26), visual disturbances: OR=3,00 (1,79–5,03) (GRADE=high).

P
PopulationAdults, pregnant women, adolescents and various patient groups (mixed indications, epilepsy, chronic pain, MS, IBD, cancer, among others) — pooled n from 101 meta-analyses
I
InterventionCannabis, cannabinoids and cannabis-based medicines (various substances and forms of administration)
C
ControlPlacebo or control groups (in the included RCTs and observational studies)
O
OutcomeCannabidiol: 50% seizure reduction (OR 0,59; 95%-CI 0,38–0,92; GRADE=high); chronic pain: 30% pain reduction (OR 0,59; 95%-CI 0,37–0,93; GRADE=high); CNS adverse effects (OR 2,84; 95%-CI 2,16–3,73; GRADE=high); convincing observational evidence for psychosis (OR 1,71; 95%-CI 1,47–2,00), low birth weight and accident risk
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Solmi M, De Toffol M, Kim J Y et al.
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348
Design: Systematic Review
Share
Abstract
Objective: To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design: Umbrella review. Data Sources: PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY Criteria For Selecting Studies: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: 101 meta-analyses were included (observational=50, RCTs=51) (AMSTAR 2 high 33, moderate 31, low 32, or critically low 5). From RCTs supported by high to moderate certainty, cannabis based medicines increased adverse events related to the central nervous system (equivalent odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 3.73)), psychological effects (3.07 (1.79 to 5.26)), and vision (3.00 (1.79 to 5.03)) in people with mixed conditions (GRADE=high), improved nausea/vomit, pain, spasticity, but increased psychiatric, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence among others (GRADE=moderate). Cannabidiol improved 50% reduction of seizures (0.59 (0.38 to 0.92)) and seizure events (0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)) (GRADE=high), but increased pneumonia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For chronic pain, cannabis based medicines or cannabinoids reduced pain by 30% (0.59 (0.37 to 0.93), GRADE=high), across different conditions (n=7), but increased psychological distress. For epilepsy, cannabidiol increased risk of diarrhoea (2.25 (1.33 to 3.81)), had no effect on sleep disruption (GRADE=high), reduced seizures across different populations and measures (n=7), improved global impression (n=2), quality of life, and increased risk of somnolence (GRADE=moderate). In the general population, cannabis worsened positive psychotic symptoms (5.21 (3.36 to 8.01)) and total psychiatric symptoms (7.49 (5.31 to 10.42)) (GRADE=high), negative psychotic symptoms, and cognition (n=11) (GRADE=moderate). In healthy people, cannabinoids improved pain threshold (0.74 (0.59 to 0.91)), unpleasantness (0.60 (0.41 to 0.88)) (GRADE=high). For inflammatory bowel disease, cannabinoids improved quality of life (0.34 (0.22 to 0.53) (GRADE=high). For multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids improved spasticity, pain, but increased risk of dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For cancer, cannabinoids improved sleep disruption, but had gastrointestinal adverse events (n=2) (GRADE=moderate). Cannabis based medicines, cannabis, and cannabinoids resulted in poor tolerability across various conditions (GRADE=moderate). Evidence was convincing from observational studies (main and sensitivity analyses) in pregnant women, small for gestational age (1.61 (1.41 to 1.83)), low birth weight (1.43 (1.27 to 1.62)); in drivers, car crash (1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)); and in the general population, psychosis (1.71 (1.47 to 2.00)). Harmful effects were noted for additional neonatal outcomes, outcomes related to car crash, outcomes in the general population including psychotic symptoms, suicide attempt, depression, and mania, and impaired cognition in healthy cannabis users (all suggestive to highly suggestive). Conclusions: Convincing or converging evidence supports avoidance of cannabis during adolescence and early adulthood, in people prone to or with mental health disorders, in pregnancy and before and while driving. Cannabidiol is effective in people with epilepsy. Cannabis based medicines are effective in people with multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, inflammatory bowel disease, and in palliative medicine but not without adverse events. Study Registration: PROSPERO CRD42018093045. Funding: None.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius