Nausea
Study register · detail RCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert) · Nausea · 2010

Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Clear benefit GRADE Moderate 154 citations
Samplen = 16 Pat.
Duration120 h post-chemotherapy period
ControlPlacebo spray, in addition to standard…
EndpointResponse rate
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert)
Cannabinoidkombination
Routeoromukosal
Key finding

Cannabis-based medicine showed a higher complete response rate against delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (71,4% vs. 22,2% with placebo) and was well tolerated.

Summary

Pilot RCT of cannabis-based medicine (THC+CBD oromucosal) vs. placebo for chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (CINV) despite standard antiemetics; n=16 (7 CBM, 9 placebo). Complete response in 71,4% (CBM) vs. 22,2% (placebo), difference 49,2% (95% CI 1%–75%), primarily in the delayed phase. Only 1 discontinuation due to adverse effects (CBM group). Mean daily dose 4,8 sprays.

P
PopulationOncological patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, n=16
I
InterventionOromucosal standardized cannabis extract (CBM; THC + CBD, whole-plant extract), acute dose titration, sprays over 120 h post-chemotherapy, in addition to standard antiemetic therapy; mean daily dose 4,8 sprays
C
ControlPlacebo spray (also 4,8 sprays/day), in addition to standard antiemetic therapy
O
OutcomeComplete response in the CBM group 71,4 % (5/7) vs. 22,2 % (2/9) in the placebo group; difference 49,2 % (95 % CI: 1 %, 75 %), driven by the delayed CINV phase
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Duran M, Pérez E, Abanades S et al
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03743.x
Design: RCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert)
Share
Abstract
Aims: Despite progress in anti-emetic treatment, many patients still suffer from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of an acute dose titration of a whole-plant cannabis-based medicine (CBM) containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, taken in conjunction with standard therapies in the control of Cinv. Methods: Patients suffering from CINV despite prophylaxis with standard anti-emetic treatment were randomized to CBM or placebo, during the 120 h post-chemotherapy period, added to standard anti-emetic treatment. Tolerability was measured as the number of withdrawals from the study during the titration period because of adverse events (AEs). The endpoint for the preliminary efficacy analysis was the proportion of patients showing complete or partial response. Results: Seven patients were randomized to CBM and nine to placebo. Only one patient in the CBM arm was withdrawn due to AEs. A higher proportion of patients in the CBM group experienced a complete response during the overall observation period [5/7 (71.4%) with CMB vs. 2/9 (22.2%) with placebo, the difference being 49.2% (95% CI 1%, 75%)], due to the delayed period. The incidence of AEs was higher in the CBM group (86% vs. 67%). No serious AEs were reported. The mean daily dose was 4.8 sprays in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, CBM added to standard antiemetic therapy was well tolerated and provided better protection against delayed CINV. These results should be confirmed in a phase III clinical trial.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius