Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
High
65 citations
SampleMeta-Analyse
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo
EndpointSeizure frequency
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignMeta-Analysis of RCTs
Cannabinoidcbd
Routeoral
Key finding
CBD showed significant efficacy versus placebo in reducing seizure frequency and responder rate, regardless of whether clobazam was combined or not.
Summary
Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (2× Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, 2× Dravet syndrome): CBD (10 and 20 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced seizure frequency — treatment ratio 0,59 (95%-CI 0,52–0,68; p<0,0001) with clobazam and 0,85 (95%-CI 0,73–0,98; p=0,022) without clobazam; 50% responder rate OR 2,51 (95%-CI 1,69–3,71; p<0,0001) with and OR 2,40 (95%-CI 1,38–4,16; p=0,002) without clobazam. CBD effective independent of concomitant medication with clobazam.
P
PopulationChildren/adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome from four RCTs, stratified by concomitant medication with clobazam (CLB)
I
InterventionCannabidiol (Epidiolex/Epidyolex) 10 and 20 mg/kg/day orally
C
ControlPlacebo
O
OutcomeSeizure frequency reduction (treatment ratio CBD vs. placebo): 0,59 (95%-CI 0,52–0,68; p<0,0001) with CLB and 0,85 (95%-CI 0,73–0,98; p=0,0226) without CLB; 50% responder rate OR 2,51 (95%-CI 1,69–3,71; p<0,0001) with CLB and 2,40 (95%-CI 1,38–4,16; p=0,0020) without CLB
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
—
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
The efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) with and without concomitant clobazam (CLB) was evaluated in stratified analyses of four large randomized controlled trials, two in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and two in Dravet syndrome. Each trial of CBD (Epidiolex in the US; Epidyolex in the EU; 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) was evaluated by CLB use. The treatment ratio was analyzed using negative binomial regression for changes in seizure frequency and logistic regression for the 50% responder rate, where the principle analysis combined both indications and CBD doses in a stratified meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic data were examined for an exposure/response relationship based on CLB presence/absence. Safety data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The meta-analysis favored CBD vs. placebo regardless of CLB use. The treatment ratio (95% CI) of CBD over placebo for the average reduction in seizure frequency was 0.59 (0.52, 0.68; P < .0001) with CLB and 0.85 (0.73, 0.98; P = .0226) without CLB, and the 50% responder rate odds ratio (95% CI) was 2.51 (1.69, 3.71; P < .0001) with CLB and 2.40 (1.38, 4.16; P = .0020) without CLB. Adverse events (AEs) related to somnolence, rash, pneumonia, or aggression were more common in patients with concomitant CLB. There was a significant exposure/response relationship for CBD and its active metabolite. These results indicate CBD is efficacious with and without CLB, but do not exclude the possibility of a synergistic effect associated with the combination of agents. The safety and tolerability profile of CBD without CLB show a lower rate of certain AEs than with CLB.
The impediment to action advances action.