A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of venlafaxine-extended release for co-occurring cannabis dependence and depressive disorders.
Levin et al.·Addiction (Abingdon, England)Impact 3.3
HarmGRADEHigh88 citations
Samplen = 103 Pat.
Duration12 weeks
ControlPlacebo plus weekly cognitive behavioral…
EndpointCannabis abstinence +…
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
”Key finding
Venlafaxine showed no benefit in reducing depressive symptoms (63% vs. 69% improvement) and led to significantly worse cannabis abstinence (11,8% vs. 36,5%) compared with placebo.
Summary
n=103 cannabis-dependent patients with comorbid major depression/dysthymia, 12-week RCT venlafaxine-XR (up to 375 mg) vs. placebo + CBT. Clinically significant depression improvement (≥50% HAM-D reduction) high in both groups: VEN-XR 63%, placebo 69% (p=0.49, no difference). Cannabis abstinence lower under VEN-XR (11.8%) vs. placebo (36.5%, p<0.01, OR=4.51 [95% CI: 1.53–13.3]). Mood improvement correlated with cannabis reduction only in the placebo group (p<0.01), not under VEN-XR.
P
PopulationAdults with DSM-IV cannabis dependence and concurrent major depression or dysthymia, n=103
I
InterventionVenlafaxine extended release (VEN-XR) up to 375 mg/day, 12 weeks, plus weekly cognitive behavioral therapy
C
ControlPlacebo plus weekly cognitive behavioral therapy
O
OutcomeNo significant difference in depression improvement (Hamilton score reduction ≥50%: VEN-XR 63% vs. placebo 69%, p=0.49); significantly worse cannabis abstinence under VEN-XR (11,8% vs. 36,5%, p<0.01, OR=4,51, 95%-CI: 1,53–13,3)
Confidence in the evidence
Very lowLowModerateHigh
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size★★★★★
BlindingDouble-blind
Effect sizeHarm
Citations / year★★★★★
Authors
Levin FR, Mariani J, Brooks DJ, Pavlicova M, Nunes EV, Agosti V, Bisaga A, Sullivan MA, Carpenter KM
Aim: To evaluate whether venlafaxine-extended release (VEN-XR) is an effective treatment for cannabis dependence with concurrent depressive disorders.
Design: This was a randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of out-patients (n = 103) with DSM-IV cannabis dependence and major depressive disorder or dysthymia. Participants received up to 375 mg VEN-XR on a fixed-flexible schedule or placebo. All patients received weekly individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy that primarily targeted Cannabis use.
Settings: The trial was conducted at two university research centers in the United States.
Participants: One hundred and three cannabis-dependent adults participated in the trial.
Measurements: The primary outcome measures were (i) abstinence from Cannabis defined as at least two consecutive urine-confirmed abstinent weeks and (ii) improvement in depressive symptoms based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
Findings: The proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant mood improvement (50% decrease in Hamilton Depression score from baseline) was high and did not differ between groups receiving VEN-XR (63%) and placebo (69%) (chi1 (2) = 0.48, P = 0.49). The proportion of patients achieving abstinence was low overall, but was significantly worse on VEN-XR (11.8%) compared to placebo (36.5%) (chi1 (2) = 7.46, P < 0.01; odds ratio = 4.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.53, 13.3). Mood improvement was associated with reduction in Cannabis use in the placebo group (F1,179 = 30.49, P < 0.01), but not the VEN-XR group (F1,186 = 0.02, P = 0.89).
Conclusions: For depressed, cannabis-dependent patients, venlafaxine-extended release does not appear to be effective at reducing depression and may lead to an increase in cannabis use.