Study register · detail
Unclear
GRADE
High
16 citations
Samplek = 6 Studien
n = 422 Pat.
n = 422 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo
EndpointAgitation/aggression
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding
No clear conclusion drawn on the efficacy of psychoactive cannabinoids for psychiatric manifestations in Alzheimer's dementia; multiple sources of bias and methodological deficiencies in the analysed studies.
Summary
Systematic review according to PRISMA-2009 of k=6 RCTs (n=422 patient-treatments, including crossover duplicates) on psychoactive cannabinoids for neuropsychiatric symptoms of Alzheimer's dementia. No clear conclusions on efficacy for agitation/aggression; methodological limitations identified due to polypharmacy and crossover designs.
P
PopulationPatients with Alzheimer's dementia and neuropsychiatric symptoms (agitation, aggression); pooled n=422 patient-treatments from 6 clinical studies
I
InterventionPsychoactive cannabinoids (various)
C
ControlPlacebo
O
OutcomeNo clear conclusions on efficacy possible; multiple sources of bias (polypragmasy, crossover design, comorbidities)
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
—
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: The systematic reviews and meta-analyses performed until now did not provide the adequate picture of actual knowledge in the field of neuropsychiatric symptoms treatment using psychotropic cannabinoids in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD).
The Study Question: Which is the level of evidence, from quantitative and qualitative point of view, concerning the efficacy and safety of the treatment with psychotropic cannabinoids of neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD?
Study Design: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar Data, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials with cannabinoids in Alzheimer dementia agitation and aggression.
Measures And Outcomes: The rationale, the objectives, and the methods used for searching the trials have been established according to PRISMA Criteria 2009.
Results: The total number of patients in the 9 publications evaluated in this study, which included data from 6 clinical trials, was 422 patients-treatments, where treatment was a psychoactive cannabinoid or placebo, some of them obtained by multiplying selected patients with the number of cannabinoid treatments in the crossover studies. There are multiple sources of bias in the analyzed studies; 2 elements have prevented conclusive results. One element was polypragmazia, a major role being played by the use of psychotropic drugs other than cannabinoids, in an effort to reduce agitation and aggressive behavior. The second one was the large number of concomitant symptoms, for example, pain (commonly causing anxiety and agitation).
Conclusions: No clear conclusion can be drawn on the effectiveness of psychoactive cannabinoids in the treatment of psychiatric manifestations, in particular agitation and aggression, in AD. In the future, large randomized controlled trial with adequate designs, without crossover and for longer duration, adapted to cannabinoid pharmacokinetics, is required to establish the real efficacy and safety of these drugs in aggressive and/or agitated patients with AD.
The impediment to action advances action.