Chronic Pain
Study register · detail Systematic Review · Chronic Pain · 2021

Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine for pain management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Mixed GRADE High 204 citations
Samplek = 36 Studien
n = 7.217 Pat.
Durationvarious treatment durations
ControlPlacebo or active control
EndpointPain reduction ≥30%/≥50%
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding

Benefit found only for cannabis <7 days and nabiximols >7 days; 81% of subgroup analyses negative; overall very low evidence quality.

Summary

Systematic review of k=36 RCTs (n=7.217) on cannabinoids, cannabis and cannabis-based medicines for pain of any kind. Evidence for benefit only for cannabis <7 days (risk difference 0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.46; 2 studies, n=231, very low quality) and nabiximols >7 days (risk difference 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.12; 6 studies, n=1.484, very low quality). 81% of subgroup analyses negative; all studies with high/unclear risk of bias. GRADE: low to very low evidence quality.

P
PopulationPersons of any age with pain of any etiology and treatment duration, pooled n=7.217
I
InterventionCannabinoids, cannabis and cannabis-based medicines (CBM), various forms of application
C
ControlPlacebo or active control
O
OutcomeLimited evidence for benefit: cannabis <7 days (RD 0,33; 95%-CI 0,20–0,46; 2 trials, n=231; very low quality) and nabiximols >7 days (RD 0,06; 95%-CI 0,01–0,12; 6 trials, n=1.484; very low quality); 81% of subgroup analyses negative; more adverse events under cannabis, nabiximols and THC vs. control
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Fisher E, Moore R A, Fogarty A E et al.
DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001929
Design: Systematic Review
Share
Abstract
Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) are increasingly used to manage pain, with limited understanding of their efficacy and safety. We summarised efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these types of drugs for treating pain using randomised controlled trials: in people of any age, with any type of pain, and for any treatment duration. Primary outcomes were 30% and 50% reduction in pain intensity, and AEs. We assessed risk of bias of included studies, and the overall quality of evidence using GRADE. Studies of <7 and >7 days treatment duration were analysed separately. We included 36 studies (7217 participants) delivering cannabinoids (8 studies), cannabis (6 studies), and CBM (22 studies); all had high and/or uncertain risk of bias. Evidence of benefit was found for cannabis <7 days (risk difference 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.46; 2 trials, 231 patients, very low-quality evidence) and nabiximols >7 days (risk difference 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.12; 6 trials, 1484 patients, very low-quality evidence). No other beneficial effects were found for other types of cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in our primary analyses; 81% of subgroup analyses were negative. Cannabis, nabiximols, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol had more AEs than control. Studies in this field have unclear or high risk of bias, and outcomes had GRADE rating of low- or very low-quality evidence. We have little confidence in the estimates of effect. The evidence neither supports nor refutes claims of efficacy and safety for cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in the management of pain.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius