Cancer
Study register · detail Querschnittsurvey (Selbstbericht) · Cancer · 2020

Medical Cannabis in Cancer Patients: A Survey of a Community Hematology Oncology Population.

Mixed GRADE Low 31 citations
Samplen = 188 Pat.
DurationJuly to December 2018
EndpointSymptom improvement
Blindingn.a.
DesignQuerschnittsurvey (Selbstbericht)
Key finding

MC users predominantly reported symptom improvement in pain, appetite and anxiety; the most frequent side effect reported was cloudy thinking.

Summary

Survey (n=188 cancer patients, oncology practice Michigan); MC use 24,5% (n=46). Symptom improvement among users: pain 81% (34/42), appetite 77,3% (34/44), anxiety 73% (32/44); improved treatment tolerance 54,5% (24/44). Baseline symptom score significantly higher in MC users vs. non-users (17,5 vs. 14,4, p<0.001). Adverse effects: impaired thinking 16,7%, lack of energy 9,8%.

P
PopulationCancer patients in outpatient oncology care, Beaumont Hospital Michigan, n=188 (thereof 46 MC users)
I
InterventionMedical cannabis (self-reported, various forms/routes of administration; patterns, efficacy and safety assessed)
O
Outcome81% of MC users reported pain improvement, 77,3% increased appetite, 73% anxiety reduction; 54,5% improved treatment tolerance; side effect 'cloudy thinking' in 16,7%
Confidence in the evidence
Low

The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Macari DM, Gbadamosi B, Jaiyesimi I, Gaikazian S.
DOI 10.1097/coc.0000000000000718
Design: Querschnittsurvey (Selbstbericht)
Share
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>Cancer patients are using medical cannabis (MC) to address symptoms; however, little data exist to guide clinicians when counseling patients. We seek to define the patterns of MC use among cancer patients, as well as efficacy and safety of MC.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Cancer patients attending oncology office visits at Beaumont Hospital, Michigan from July to December 2018 were anonymously surveyed. The survey included data regarding demographics, diagnosis, treatment, symptom burden, and MC use. Patients who reported MC use since their cancer diagnosis completed a section on patterns of use, efficacy, and safety.<h4>Results</h4>The response rate was 188 of 327 (57.5%). MC use was reported by 46 of 188 (24.5%). A median composite baseline symptom score ranging from 8 (best) to 32 (worst) was higher in patients using MC versus nonusers; 17.5 versus 14.4 (P<0.001). Pain was the symptom with the highest frequency of improvement 34/42 (81%), followed by appetite 34/44 (77.3%), and anxiety 32/44 (73%). MC improved the ability to tolerate treatment in 24/44 (54.5%). Cloudy thinking is the symptom that worsened the most 7/42 (16.7%), with decreased energy being experienced by 4/41 (9.8%) of the users.<h4>Conclusions</h4>MC was utilized by a significant portion of cancer patients in this sample, across age, diagnosis, stage, and treatment. Patients with a higher severity of baseline symptoms were more likely to use MC and report a favorable efficacy profile of MC. Minimal toxicity was reported in this cohort. Prospective studies are needed to define the efficacy and safety of MC.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius