Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
424 citations
Samplen = 58 Pat.
Duration5 weeks
ControlPlacebo oromucosal spray
EndpointNRS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRandomized Controlled Trial
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Routeoromukosal
Key finding
Sativex showed statistically significant improvements in pain on movement, pain at rest, sleep quality, DAS28 and the SF-MPQ pain component compared to placebo.
Summary
n=58 RA patients; Sativex (nabiximols, oromucosal) vs. placebo over 5 weeks: significant improvements in pain on movement, pain at rest, sleep quality, DAS28 and SF-MPQ pain component (all p<0,05); no significant effect on morning stiffness. First controlled cannabinoid RCT in rheumatoid arthritis.
P
PopulationAdults with rheumatoid arthritis, n=58
I
InterventionSativex (THC/CBD oromucosal spray), evening application, mean daily dose 5,4 sprays
C
ControlPlacebo oromucosal spray
O
OutcomeSignificant improvement in pain on movement, pain at rest, sleep quality, DAS28 and SF-MPQ (pain right now) vs. placebo; no significant effect on morning stiffness
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of a cannabis-based medicine (CBM) in the treatment of pain due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared a CBM (Sativex) with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study in 58 patients over 5 weeks of treatment. The CBM was administered by oromucosal spray in the evening and assessments were made the following morning. Efficacy outcomes assessed were pain on movement, pain at rest, morning stiffness and sleep quality measured by a numerical rating scale, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and the DAS28 measure of disease activity. Seventy-five patients were screened and 58 met the eligibility criteria. Thirty-one were randomized to the CBM and 27 to placebo. Mean (S.D.) daily dose achieved in the final treatment week was 5.4 (0.84) actuations for the CBM and 5.3 (1.18) for placebo. In comparison with placebo, the CBM produced statistically significant improvements in pain on movement, pain at rest, quality of sleep, DAS28 and the SF-MPQ pain at present component. There was no effect on morning stiffness but baseline scores were low. The large majority of adverse effects were mild or moderate, and there were no adverse effect-related withdrawals or serious adverse effects in the active treatment group. In the first ever controlled trial of a CBM in RA, a significant analgesic effect was observed and disease activity was significantly suppressed following Sativex treatment. Whilst the differences are small and variable across the population, they represent benefits of clinical relevance and show the need for more detailed investigation in this indication.
The impediment to action advances action.