Neuropathic Pain
Study register · detail Neuropathic Pain · 2022

The Efficacy, Adverse Events, and Withdrawal Rates of the Pharmacological Management of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mixed 18 citations
Samplen = 6
Duration2 weeks to 4 months
ControlPlacebo
EndpointPain intensity
Blindingunklar
Key finding

Pregabalin showed efficacy against neuropathic pain, lidocaine effective in 2 of 3 studies, ketamine showed effectiveness (poor quality), cannabinoids ineffective; adverse effects were a frequent cause of discontinuation.

Summary

Systematic review + meta-analysis on pharmacotherapy of chronic spinal cord injury pain; k=21 studies for efficacy analysis, k=17 for adverse effects/discontinuation rates. Pregabalin effective for neuropathic pain (3/3 studies); cannabinoids ineffective for neuropathic pain (1 study, 28,6% discontinuation rate). Pregabalin: increased risk for somnolence (RR 3,15, 95% CI 2,00–4,98) and dizziness (RR 2,9, 95% CI 1,58–5,30).

P
PopulationAdults with chronic spinal cord injury pain (Spinal Cord Injury Pain); pooled from 21 studies (efficacy analysis) or 17 studies (AE/discontinuation analysis)
I
InterventionPharmacological treatment (anticonvulsants, antidepressants, analgesics, antispastics, cannabinoids, others)
C
ControlPlacebo (in the included RCTs)
O
OutcomePregabalin effective for neuropathic pain (3/3 studies); cannabinoids ineffective (1/1 study); discontinuation rate under cannabinoids 28,6%; pregabalin increased risk for somnolence (RR 3,15; 95%-CI 2,00–4,98) and dizziness (RR 2,9; 95%-CI 1,58–5,30)
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Mixed
Citations / year
Authors
Canavan C, Inoue T, McMahon S, Doody C, Blake C, Fullen BM
Share
Abstract
Objective: To establish the efficacy of medications, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and withdrawal rates associated with the pharmacological management of chronic spinal cord injury pain. Methodology: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO were searched (November 2017) and updated (January 2020). Two independent review authors screened and identified papers for inclusion. Results: Twenty-one studies met inclusion requirements for efficacy analysis and 17 for AE and withdrawal rate analysis; no additional papers were included from the updated 2020 search. Treatments were divided into six categories: anticonvulsants (n = 6), antidepressants (n = 3), analgesics (n = 8), anti-spasticity medications (n = 2), cannabinoids (n = 1), and other (n = 2). Trials of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and cannabinoids included long-term follow-up trials (2 weeks to 4 months), and trials of analgesics and anti-spasticity medications, among others, were short-term trials (0-2 days). Effectiveness for neuropathic pain was found for pregabalin (3/3 studies) and lidocaine (2/3 studies). Studies using ketamine also reported effectiveness (2/2), but the quality of these papers was rated as poor. The most frequently reported AEs included dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, and constipation. Pregabalin was associated with a higher risk of somnolence (risk ratio [RR] 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-4.98) and dizziness (RR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.58-5.30). Ketamine was associated with a higher risk of reduced vision (RR 9.00, 95% CI: 0.05-146.11), dizziness (RR 8.33, 95% CI: 1.73-40.10), and somnolence (RR 7.00, 95% CI: 1.73-40.1). Withdrawal rates ranged from 18.4% for antidepressants to 0-30% for anticonvulsants, 0-10% for anti-spasticity medications, 0-48% for analgesics, 28.6% for cannabinoids, and 0-22.2% for other medications. Conclusion: Pregabalin was found to be effective for neuropathic pain vs placebo. Cannabinoids were ineffective for neuropathic pain. AEs are a common cause for withdrawal. The nature of AEs was poorly reported, and AE reporting should be improved in future randomized controlled trials.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius