Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
240 citations
Samplen = 21 Pat.
Duration18 days
ControlPlacebo capsules orally, 2× daily
EndpointTaste and Smell Survey
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (double-blind, placebo-controlled)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose5.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding
THC significantly improved chemosensory perception, taste of food, pre-meal appetite, and protein intake compared to placebo in cancer patients with chemosensory alterations.
Summary
n=21 completed treatments (THC n=24, placebo n=22), 18-day double-blind pilot study; THC improved chemosensory perception (P=0.026) and taste intensity (P<0.001), meal appetite (P=0.05) and protein proportion of calories (P=0.008); sleep quality (P=0.025) and relaxation (P=0.045) also significantly improved vs. placebo.
P
PopulationAdults with advanced cancer, poor appetite and chemosensory changes, n=46 randomised, 21 study completions
I
InterventionTHC (dronabinol/Marinol) 2,5 mg orally, 2× daily
C
ControlPlacebo capsules orally, 2× daily
O
OutcomeImproved chemosensory perception (p=0,026), increased intensity (p<0,001), improved taste (p=0,04), higher pre-meal appetite (p=0,05), increased protein-calorie proportion (p=0,008) vs. placebo
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: A pilot study (NCT00316563) to determine if delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can improve taste and smell (chemosensory) perception as well as appetite, caloric intake, and quality of life (QOL) for cancer patients with chemosensory alterations.
Patients And Methods: Adult advanced cancer patients, with poor appetite and chemosensory alterations, were recruited from two sites and randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive either THC (2.5 mg, Marinol((R)); Solvay Pharma Inc., n = 24) or placebo oral capsules (n = 22) twice daily for 18 days. Twenty-one patients completed the trial. At baseline and posttreatment, patients completed a panel of patient-reported outcomes: Taste and Smell Survey, 3-day food record, appetite and macronutrient preference assessments, QOL questionnaire, and an interview.
Results: THC and placebo groups were comparable at baseline. Compared with placebo, THC-treated patients reported improved (P = 0.026) and enhanced (P < 0.001) chemosensory perception and food 'tasted better' (P = 0.04). Premeal appetite (P = 0.05) and proportion of calories consumed as protein increased compared with placebo (P = 0.008). THC-treated patients reported increased quality of sleep (P = 0.025) and relaxation (P = 0.045). QOL scores and total caloric intake were improved in both THC and placebo groups.
Conclusions: THC may be useful in the palliation of chemosensory alterations and to improve food enjoyment for cancer patients.
The impediment to action advances action.