Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Low
15 citations
Samplen = 13 Pat.
EndpointHRQoL
Blindingn.a.
DesignOpen-Label-Studie (nicht randomisiert)
Cannabinoidthc
Routeoral
Key finding
Oral THC led to adequate pain relief in only a portion of patients, while the majority did not respond sufficiently.
Summary
Open-label study (n=13) of oral delta-9-THC in chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) without response to standard therapy; 5 of 13 patients (38%) reported adequate response, 8 of 13 (62%) inadequate or no response; 6 patients with adverse events, 2 study discontinuations. Oral THC therapy in selected therapy-refractory CNMP patients possibly an option.
P
PopulationAdults with chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP), refractory to conventional pharmacotherapy, n=13
I
InterventionOral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC), add-on, dose not further specified
O
Outcome5 of 13 patients reported adequate response; 8 patients reported inadequate or no response; 6 patients experienced adverse events, of which 2 discontinuations of therapy
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Downgraded for
Risk of biasImprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Cannabinoids have been used for pain relief for centuries and recent studies have investigated their analgesic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, as well as clinical efficacy, in treating chronic pain. We report an open-label study addressed to evaluate the effect and adverse events of orally administered Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta-9-THC) in 13 patients with chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) unresponsive to conventional pharmacotherapy. The effect of the treatment was assessed on an eight-item HRQoL questionnaire. Five out of 13 patients reported adequate response to the treatment while eight patients reported inadequate or no response. Seven patients did not experience any adverse events (AEs), six patients reported AEs, two of which discontinued the treatment. We conclude that oral THC may be a valuable therapeutic option for selected patients with CNMP that are unresponsive to previous treatments, though further research is warranted to characterize those patients.
The impediment to action advances action.