Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Low
59 citations
Samplen = 3.762 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlMonozygotic co-twin control analyses
EndpointSocioeconomic outcomes
Blindingn.a.
DesignLongitudinale Zwillingsstudie (3 Kohorten)
Key finding
Adolescent cannabis use presumably has causal negative effects on educational performance and socioeconomic outcomes, but not on mental health or cognitive abilities in adulthood.
Summary
Longitudinal twin study (n=3.762) on cannabis use in adolescence and outcomes in young adulthood: Univariately higher psychopathology with heavier use, but monozygotic co-twin control analyses showed NO causal signal for mental health (including depression) in adulthood — only socioeconomic outcomes remained (education, income, occupational status). Confounding by shared genetic/environmental factors explains the association.
P
PopulationAdolescent twin pairs from three longitudinal studies, n=3.762, with prospective assessment of cannabis use in adolescence
I
InterventionCumulative cannabis use in adolescence (prospectively assessed)
C
ControlMonozygotic co-twin control analyses (genetically and environmentally matched twin pairs without or with lower cannabis use)
O
OutcomeCannabis use remained significantly associated with socioeconomic outcomes (educational attainment, occupational status, income) after controlling for genetic and shared environmental confounding; no independent effect on psychiatric or cognitive outcomes
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Observational studies have linked cannabis use to an array of negative outcomes, including psychiatric symptoms, cognitive impairment, and educational and occupational underachievement. These associations are particularly strong when cannabis use occurs in adolescence. Nevertheless, causality remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was thus to examine associations between prospectively assessed adolescent cannabis use and young-adult outcomes (psychiatric, cognitive, and socioeconomic) in three longitudinal studies of twins (<i>n</i> = 3,762). Twins reporting greater cumulative cannabis use in adolescence reported higher levels of psychopathology as well as poorer socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood. However, cannabis use remained associated only with socioeconomic outcomes (i.e., educational attainment, occupational status, and income) in monozygotic-cotwin control analyses, which account fully for shared genetic and environmental confounding. Follow-up analyses examining associations between twin differences in adolescent cannabis use and longitudinal change in academic functioning during the middle- and high-school years provided a possible mechanism for these associations, indicating that greater cannabis use during this period was associated with decreases in grade point average and academic motivation as well as increases in academic problem behavior and school disciplinary problems. Our findings thus suggest that cannabis use in adolescence has potentially causal, deleterious effects on adolescent academic functioning and young-adult socioeconomic outcomes despite little evidence suggesting a strong, causal influence on adult mental health or cognitive ability.
The impediment to action advances action.