Cancer
Study register · detail Randomized Controlled Trial · Cancer · 1980

Antiemetics in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer: a randomized comparison of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and prochlorperazine.

Clear benefit GRADE Moderate 259 citations
Samplen = 79 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlProchlorperazine, oral, double-blind…
EndpointComplete remission
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRandomized Controlled Trial
Cannabinoidthc
Routeoral
Key finding

THC showed more complete responses (36 of 79 courses) than prochlorperazine (16 of 78 courses) in chemotherapy patients with prior therapy resistance.

Summary

n=79 chemotherapy cycles (THC) vs. 78 (prochlorperazine); complete antiemesis: 36/79 (THC) vs. 16/78 (prochlorperazine); patient preference for THC 20/25 (p=0,005); in patients <20 years complete remission 15/20 vs. 21/59 in older patients (p=0,004).

P
PopulationCancer patients under chemotherapy without response to standard antiemetics, n=79 course units (THC) vs. 78 (prochlorperazine), crossover
I
InterventionDelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), oral, dose not specified
C
ControlProchlorperazine (Compazine), oral, double-blind, crossover
O
OutcomeMore frequent complete remissions under THC (36/79 courses) vs. prochlorperazine (16/78 courses); patient preference for THC: 20/25 (p=0,005); younger patients (<20 y.) benefited more strongly (15/20 THC courses with complete response, p=0,004)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Sallan SE, Cronin C, Zelen M, Zinberg NE
DOI 10.1056/nejm198001173020302
Design: Randomized Controlled Trial
Share
Abstract
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is an effective antiemetic as compared with placebos in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. In this study we compared THC with prochlorperazine (compazine) in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial with patients who had failed to benefit from standard antiemetic therapy. Regardless of the emetic activity of the chemotherapeutic agents, there were more complete responses to THC courses (in 36 of 79 courses) than to prochlorperazine (in 16 of 78 courses). Of 25 patients who were treated with both drugs and who expressed a preference, 20 preferred THC (P = 0.005). Among patients under 20 years of age there was a higher proportion of complete responses to THC courses (15 of 20) than among older patients (21 of 59 courses; P = 0.004). Increased food intake occurred more frequently with THC (P = 0.008) and was associated with the presence of a "high." Of 36 THC courses resulting in complete antiemetic responses, 32 were associated with a high. We conclude that THC is an effective antiemetic in many patients who receive chemotherapy for cancer and for whom other antiemetics are ineffective.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius