Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
High
4 citations
Samplen = 216.257 Pat. (gepoolt)
ControlNo cannabis use
EndpointPOAG risk
Blindingn.a.
DesignMeta-Analyse
Key finding
Mendelian randomisation analysis shows no evidence of a causal relationship between cannabis use and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Summary
Mendelian randomisation study on cannabis and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG); n=16.677 cases + 199.580 controls. No causal association between lifetime cannabis use and POAG (OR=1.04, 95% CI 0.88–1.23) or cannabis use disorder and POAG (OR=0.97, 95% CI 0.92–1.03). Sensitivity analyses confirm the null finding.
P
PopulationPersons of European descent from GWAS data; POAG GWAS: 16.677 cases and 199.580 controls
I
InterventionGenetically instrumented cannabis use (lifetime use or cannabis use disorder) as MR exposure variable
C
ControlNo cannabis use (Mendelian randomisation approach)
O
OutcomeNo causal association between cannabis use and POAG: OR 1,04 (95%-KI 0,88–1,23) for lifetime use; OR 0,97 (95%-KI 0,92–1,03) for cannabis use disorder
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
—
Blinding
—
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Several observational studies have investigated the association between cannabis use and intraocular pressure, but its association with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) remains unclear. In this study, we leveraged human genetic data to assess through Mendelian randomization (MR) whether cannabis use affects POAG. We used five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with lifetime cannabis use (P-value < 5 x 10(-8)) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) (N = 184,765) by the International Cannabis Consortium, 23andMe, and UK Biobank and eleven SNPs associated with cannabis use disorder (P-value < 5 x 10(-7)) from a GWAS meta-analysis of (17,068 cases and 357,219 controls of European descent) from Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Substance Use Disorders working group, Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, and deCode. We associated the selected five SNPs from the GWAS of lifetime cannabis use and the eleven SNPs from the GWAS of cannabis use disorder, with the largest to date GWAS meta-analysis of POAG (16,677 cases and 199,580 controls). MR analysis suggested no evidence for a causal association of lifetime cannabis use and cannabis use disorder with POAG (odds ratio (OR) of outcome per doubling of the odds of exposure (95% confidence interval): 1.04 (0.88; 1.23) for lifetime cannabis use and 0.97 (0.92; 1.03) for cannabis use disorder). Sensitivity analyses to address pleiotropy and weak instrument bias yielded similar estimates to the primary analysis. In conclusion, our results do not support a causal association between cannabis use and POAG.
The impediment to action advances action.