Addiction
Study register · detail Phase-2a-RCT (placebokontrolliert, doppelblind, adaptiv Bayesianisch) · Addiction · 2020

Cannabidiol for the treatment of cannabis use disorder: a phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, adaptive Bayesian trial.

Clear benefit GRADE Moderate 196 citations
Samplen = 82 Pat.
Duration4 weeks
ControlMatched placebo
EndpointTHC-COOH:creatinine ratio
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignPhase-2a-RCT (placebokontrolliert, doppelblind, adaptiv Bayesianisch)
Cannabinoidcbd
Max. dose800.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

CBD 400 mg and 800 mg significantly reduced cannabis use and increased abstinence compared with placebo; CBD was well tolerated with no severe adverse events.

Summary

First RCT on CBD in cannabis use disorder (n=82, Lancet Psychiatry): CBD 400 mg vs. placebo reduced THC-COOH:creatinine ratio by -94,21 ng/mL (95%-interval -161,83 to -35,56) and increased abstinence days by +0,48/week (0,15–0,82); CBD 800 mg: -72,02 ng/mL (-135,47 to -19,52). Posterior probability of superiority vs. placebo >0,9995 (400 mg) and >0,9965 (800 mg) respectively. No serious adverse events; 94% treatment adherence.

P
PopulationAdults with cannabis use disorder (DSM-5), n=82
I
InterventionOral cannabidiol 200 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg daily over 4 weeks (plus brief motivational intervention)
C
ControlMatched placebo (plus brief motivational intervention)
O
OutcomeCBD 400 mg and 800 mg surpassed the primary endpoints (posterior probability >0,9): CBD 400 mg reduced THC-COOH:creatinine ratio by −94,21 ng/mL (95%-CI: −161,83 to −35,56) and increased abstinence days by +0,48 days/week (0,15–0,82); CBD 200 mg was eliminated as inefficient
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Freeman TP, Hindocha C, Baio G, Shaban NDC, Thomas EM, Astbury D, Freeman AM, Lees R, Craft S, Morrison PD, Bloomfield MAP, O'Ryan D, Kinghorn J, Morgan CJA, Mofeez A, Curran HV.
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30290-x
Design: Phase-2a-RCT (placebokontrolliert, doppelblind, adaptiv Bayesianisch)
Share
Abstract
Background A substantial and unmet clinical need exists for pharmacological treatment of cannabis use disorders. Cannabidiol could offer a novel treatment, but it is unclear which doses might be efficacious or safe. Therefore, we aimed to identify efficacious doses and eliminate inefficacious doses in a phase 2a trial using an adaptive Bayesian design.<h4>Methods</h4>We did a phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, adaptive Bayesian trial at the Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit (University College London, London, UK). We used an adaptive Bayesian dose-finding design to identify efficacious or inefficacious doses at a-priori interim and final analysis stages. Participants meeting cannabis use disorder criteria from DSM-5 were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) in the first stage of the trial to 4-week treatment with three different doses of oral cannabidiol (200 mg, 400 mg, or 800 mg) or with matched placebo during a cessation attempt by use of a double-blinded block randomisation sequence. All participants received a brief psychological intervention of motivational interviewing. For the second stage of the trial, new participants were randomly assigned to placebo or doses deemed efficacious in the interim analysis. The primary objective was to identify the most efficacious dose of cannabidiol for reducing cannabis use. The primary endpoints were lower urinary 11-nor-9-carboxy-δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH):creatinine ratio, increased days per week with abstinence from cannabis during treatment, or both, evidenced by posterior probabilities that cannabidiol is better than placebo exceeding 0·9. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02044809) and the EU Clinical Trials Register (2013-000361-36).<h4>Findings</h4>Between May 28, 2014, and Aug 12, 2015 (first stage), 48 participants were randomly assigned to placebo (n=12) and to cannabidiol 200 mg (n=12), 400 mg (n=12), and 800 mg (n=12). At interim analysis, cannabidiol 200 mg was eliminated from the trial as an inefficacious dose. Between May 24, 2016, and Jan 12, 2017 (second stage), randomisation continued and an additional 34 participants were allocated (1:1:1) to cannabidiol 400 mg (n=12), cannabidiol 800 mg (n=11), and placebo (n=11). At final analysis, cannabidiol 400 mg and 800 mg exceeded primary endpoint criteria (0·9) for both primary outcomes. For urinary THC-COOH:creatinine ratio, the probability of being the most efficacious dose compared with placebo given the observed data was 0·9995 for cannabidiol 400 mg and 0·9965 for cannabidiol 800 mg. For days with abstinence from cannabis, the probability of being the most efficacious dose compared with placebo given the observed data was 0·9966 for cannabidiol 400 mg and 0·9247 for cannabidiol 800 mg. Compared with placebo, cannabidiol 400 mg decreased THC-COOH:creatinine ratio by -94·21 ng/mL (95% interval estimate -161·83 to -35·56) and increased abstinence from cannabis by 0·48 days per week (0·15 to 0·82). Compared with placebo, cannabidiol 800 mg decreased THC-COOH:creatinine ratio by -72·02 ng/mL (-135·47 to -19·52) and increased abstinence from cannabis by 0·27 days per week (-0·09 to 0·64). Cannabidiol was well tolerated, with no severe adverse events recorded, and 77 (94%) of 82 participants completed treatment.<h4>Interpretation</h4>In the first randomised clinical trial of cannabidiol for cannabis use disorder, cannabidiol 400 mg and 800 mg were safe and more efficacious than placebo at reducing cannabis use.<h4>Funding</h4>Medical Research Council.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius