Multiple Sclerosis
Study register · detail RCT · Multiple Sclerosis · 2013

Effect of dronabinol on progression in progressive multiple sclerosis (CUPID): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

No benefit demonstrated GRADE High 128 citations
Samplen = 493 Pat.
Duration36 months
ControlPlacebo
EndpointEDSS progression
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose28.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

Dronabinol showed no significant effect on progression of progressive multiple sclerosis (HR 0,92; p=0,57).

Summary

CUPID trial: multicentre RCT (n=493, of which n=329 dronabinol, n=164 placebo) over 36 months in progressive MS. Primary endpoint EDSS progression: HR 0,92 (95% CI 0,68–1,23; p=0,57) — no significant effect on disease progression. Mean annual MSIS-29-PHYS change 0,62 points (dronabinol) vs. 1,03 points (placebo).

P
PopulationAdults (18–65 years) with primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, n=493 (evaluated: 329 dronabinol, 164 placebo)
I
InterventionOral dronabinol (delta-9-THC), max. 28 mg/day, weight- and tolerability-adjusted titration
C
ControlPlacebo (identical oral preparation)
O
OutcomeNo significant difference in EDSS progression (HR 0,92; 95%-CI 0,68–1,23; p=0,57); mean annual change in MSIS-29-PHYS: −0,9 points (95%-CI −2,0 to 0,2) favouring dronabinol, not significant
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Zajicek J, Ball S, Wright D, Vickery J, Nunn A, Miller D, Cano MG, McManus D, Mallik S, Hobart J
Share
Abstract
Background: Laboratory evidence has shown that cannabinoids might have a neuroprotective action. We investigated whether oral dronabinol (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) might slow the course of progressive multiple sclerosis. Methods: In this multicentre, parallel, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we recruited patients aged 18-65 years with primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis from 27 UK neurology or rehabilitation departments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dronabinol or placebo for 36 months; randomisation was by stochastic minimisation, using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, balanced according to expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, centre, and disease type. Maximum dose was 28 mg per day, titrated against bodyweight and adverse effects. Primary outcomes were EDSS score progression (masked assessor, time to progression of >/=1 point from a baseline score of 4.0-5.0 or >/=0.5 points from a baseline score of >/=5.5, confirmed after 6 months) and change from baseline in the physical impact subscale of the 29-item multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29-PHYS). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 62942668). Findings: Of the 498 patients randomly assigned to a treatment group, 329 received at least one dose of dronabinol and 164 received at least one dose of placebo (five did not receive the allocated intervention). 145 patients in the dronabinol group had EDSS score progression (0.24 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate) compared with 73 in the placebo group (0.23 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate); HR for prespecified primary analysis was 0.92 (95% CI 0.68-1.23; p=0.57). Mean yearly change in MSIS-29-PHYS score was 0.62 points (SD 3.29) in the dronabinol group versus 1.03 points (3.74) in the placebo group. Primary analysis with a multilevel model gave an estimated between-group difference (dronabinol-placebo) of -0.9 points (95% CI -2.0 to 0.2). We noted no serious safety concerns (114 [35%] patients in the dronabinol group had at least one serious adverse event, compared with 46 [28%] in the placebo group). Interpretation: Our results show that dronabinol has no overall effect on the progression of multiple sclerosis in the progressive phase. The findings have implications for the design of future studies of progressive multiple sclerosis, because lower than expected progression rates might have affected our ability to detect clinical change. Funding: UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, Multiple Sclerosis Society, and Multiple Sclerosis Trust.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius