Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Very low
9 citations
Samplen = 42 Pat.
Duration≥3 months follow-up…
EndpointSeizure frequency reduction
Blindingn.a.
DesignKohortenstudie
Cannabinoidcbd
Routeoral
Key finding
In 52% of patients seizure reduction >30% (23% responders, 29% super-responders after 3 months), efficacy remained maintained over 12 months.
Summary
Real-world study on CBD in treatment-refractory epilepsy, n=42 (24 on-label: Lennox-Gastaut n=18, Dravet n=5, tuberous sclerosis n=1; 18 off-label). After 3 months 23% responders (>30% seizure reduction) and 29% super-responders (≥80% reduction); effect persisted over 6 and 12 months. Adverse events in 52,3% (most common: somnolence 36,5%, diarrhoea 9,8%). Retention rate: 85,7% (3 months), 78,6% (6 months), 71,4% (12 months).
P
PopulationAdults with treatment-resistant epilepsy (on-label and off-label CBD indications), n=42, mean age 36,1 years
I
InterventionCannabidiol (CBD, Epidyolex) as add-on therapy, dosage not specified, oral
O
OutcomeAfter 3 months: 23% responders (>30–<80% seizure reduction), 29% super-responders (≥80% reduction); efficacy maintained at 6 and 12 months; retention rate 85,7% / 78,6% / 71,4% after 3/6/12 months; 52,3% adverse events (most common: somnolence 36,5%, diarrhoea 9,8%)
Confidence in the evidence
Very low
The lowest GRADE level, the effect estimate remains uncertain.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD) for the treatment of epilepsy in a real-world setting.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we included PwE with epilepsy who received a prescription for CBD between 01.03.2019 and 30.11.2022 and had a follow-up period >/= 3 months. Participants were evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. "Responders" were defined as individuals experiencing a reduction in seizure frequency > 30% but < 80% compared to baseline, while "super responders" were those with a reduction >/= 80%. Adverse events were recorded to assess safety.
Results: Forty-two PwE were included (mean age 36.1 +/- 10.9 years; 14 females). In 24 patients CBD was prescribed on-label (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, n = 18; Dravet syndrome, n = 5; tuberous sclerosis, n = 1), while 18 patients were treated off-label (ring chromosome 20 syndrome, n = 1; ring chromosome 17 syndrome, n = 1; Lafora disease, n = 3; Unverricht-Lundborg disease, n = 1; polymicrogyria, n = 2; febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome, n = 1; non-lesional focal epilepsy, n = 2; developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathy of unknown etiology n = 6). The mean number of concomitant antiseizure medications was 3.4 (>/=2 for all patients). At 3 months, 10 subjects (23%) were "responders" and 12 (29%) were "super-responders". Efficacy was sustained at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-two patients (52.3%) developed AEs, with drowsiness (36.5%) and diarrhea (9.8%) being the most common. The retention rate was 85.7%, 78.6%, and 71.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.
Conclusions: In this monocentric real-world study, CBD was a safe and effective therapeutic option for highly drug-resistant patients, leading to a dramatic reduction in seizure frequency in over one-fourth of them, including off-label indications.
The impediment to action advances action.