Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Low
86 citations
Samplen = 1.709 Pat.
Durationfrom mean 16,6 years to mean…
EndpointPanic attacks/disorder
Blindingn.a.
DesignProspektive Längsschnittstudie (Kohorte)
Key finding
Cannabis use was prospectively associated with panic disorder, but this association was eliminated after controlling for daily cigarette smoking.
Summary
Prospective longitudinal study (n=1.709 adolescents, baseline age 16,6 years), follow-up into adulthood (mean 24,2 years); cannabis use and dependence significantly prospectively associated with increased odds for panic attacks and panic disorder. After controlling for daily cigarette smoking, no incremental effect demonstrable — no isolated proof of causality for cannabis.
P
PopulationAdolescents and young adults without panic disorder at baseline, n=1709, mean age 16,6 years (SD=1,2) at study start
I
InterventionCannabis use, abuse and dependence (naturalistically assessed, no experimental administration)
O
OutcomeCannabis use and dependence significantly prospectively associated with increased odds for panic attacks and panic disorder; association no longer incremental after controlling for daily cigarette smoking
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
The present study prospectively evaluated cannabis use, abuse, and dependence in relation to the development of panic attacks and panic disorder. Participants at the start of the study were adolescents (n=1709) with a mean age of 16.6 years (SD=1.2; time 1) and were re-assessed 1 year later (time 2) and then again as young adults (time 3; mean age=24.2 years, SD=0.6). Results indicated that cannabis use and dependence were significantly prospectively associated with an increased odds for the development of panic attacks and panic disorder. However, cannabis was not incrementally associated with the development of panic after controlling for daily cigarette smoking. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
The impediment to action advances action.