Chronic Pain
Study register · detail Meta-Analyse (Individual Patient Data) · Chronic Pain · 2015

Inhaled Cannabis for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

Clear benefit GRADE High 260 citations
Samplek = 5 Studien
n = 178 Pat.
Durationdays to weeks
ControlPlacebo
EndpointPain reduction
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignMeta-Analyse (Individual Patient Data)
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Routeinhalativ
Key finding

Inhaled cannabis leads to short-term pain reductions in chronic neuropathic pain in 1 of 5-6 treated patients (NNT = 5,6).

Summary

Bayesian IPD meta-analysis across k=5 RCTs (n=178, 405 observed responses) on inhaled cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain vs. placebo. Number Needed to Treat=5.6 (Bayesian 95% credible interval 3.4–14) for short-term pain reduction; about 1 of 5–6 patients benefits. Bayes factor=332, posterior probability of effect 99.7%. Limitations: short follow-up duration (days to weeks), small number of studies, inadequate allocation concealment, substantial attrition.

P
PopulationAdults with chronic neuropathic pain, pooled n=178, from 5 RCTs
I
InterventionInhaled cannabis (various administration forms/dosages)
C
ControlPlacebo
O
OutcomeNNT=5,6 (Bayesian 95% CI: 3,4–14); posterior probability of effect 99,7% (Bayes factor=332)
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Andreae M H, Carter G M, Shaparin N et al.
DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.009
Design: Meta-Analyse (Individual Patient Data)
Share
Abstract
Chronic neuropathic pain, the most frequent condition affecting the peripheral nervous system, remains underdiagnosed and difficult to treat. Inhaled cannabis may alleviate chronic neuropathic pain. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence on the use of inhaled cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of individual patient data. We registered our protocol with PROSPERO CRD42011001182. We searched in Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE, and AMED. We considered all randomized controlled trials investigating chronic painful neuropathy and comparing inhaled cannabis with placebo. We pooled treatment effects following a hierarchical random-effects Bayesian responder model for the population-averaged subject-specific effect. Our evidence synthesis of individual patient data from 178 participants with 405 observed responses in 5 randomized controlled trials following patients for days to weeks provides evidence that inhaled cannabis results in short-term reductions in chronic neuropathic pain for 1 in every 5 to 6 patients treated (number needed to treat = 5.6 with a Bayesian 95% credible interval ranging between 3.4 and 14). Our inferences were insensitive to model assumptions, priors, and parameter choices. We caution that the small number of studies and participants, the short follow-up, shortcomings in allocation concealment, and considerable attrition limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the review. The Bayes factor is 332, corresponding to a posterior probability of effect of 99.7%. PERSPECTIVE: This novel Bayesian meta-analysis of individual patient data from 5 randomized trials suggests that inhaled cannabis may provide short-term relief for 1 in 5 to 6 patients with neuropathic pain. Pragmatic trials are needed to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of this treatment.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius