Cannabinoid Hyperemesis
Study register · detail Systematic Review · Cannabinoid Hyperemesis · 2025

Treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: A systematic review and treatment algorithm for consultation-liaison psychiatrists.

Clear benefit GRADE Moderate 4 citations
Samplek = 34 Studien
n = 63 Pat.
Durationunclear
EndpointSymptom improvement
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding

Capsaicin cream, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines showed more effective improvement of CHS symptoms (nausea, hyperemesis, urge for hot showers) compared with commonly used antiemetics such as promethazine, ondansetron and metoclopramide.

Summary

Systematic review on cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) treatment; k=34 articles with n=63 individual cases. Capsaicin cream, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines showed better efficacy for CHS symptoms (nausea, hyperemesis, urge for heat) than conventional antiemetics (promethazine, ondansetron, metoclopramide). Authors propose a treatment algorithm for consultation-liaison psychiatrists.

P
PopulationPatients with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS), n=63 individual cases from 34 studies
I
InterventionPharmacological treatment strategies (including capsaicin cream, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, antiemetics)
O
OutcomeCapsaicin cream, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines showed more effective relief of nausea, hyperemesis and compulsive showering than classic antiemetics (promethazine, ondansetron, metoclopramide)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size Clear benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Hsu J, Kashyap S, Hurd C, McCormack L, Herrmann Z, Schwartz AC, Jackson J, DeMoss D
DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.10.012
Design: Systematic Review
Share
Abstract
Background: Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) is a cyclical vomiting syndrome associated with chronic cannabis use and is often resistant to anti-emetics. Despite increasing incidence of suspected CHS, literature regarding its treatment is limited, and there are no established treatment guidelines. Objectives: With the goal of establishing treatment guidelines for consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists managing CHS, the authors systematically reviewed existing literature for pharmacologic treatment strategies using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. With the results of the review, the authors propose a treatment algorithm for Chs. Methods: We searched PubMed, PyschINFO & PsychARTICLES, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to July 2021 to identify literature describing treatment of CHS. We included cases of CHS where patient-level data describing the treatment of CHS was available. Pharmacologic treatments were considered beneficial if the patient's nausea, hyperemesis, and urge to take hot showers resolved. Non-independent review of exclusion criteria assisted in reducing individual bias of the literature. Results: The authors identified 34 eligible articles, consisting of 63 individual cases. Among these articles and cases, capsaicin cream, antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines were reported to improve CHS more effectively than other, more frequently used anti-emetics, such as promethazine, ondansetron, and metoclopramide. Conclusion: An examination of treatment strategies for CHS can allow for more effective care while providing a foundation for further research in treatment. This proposed algorithm is designed to aid in establishing treatment strategies for C-L psychiatrists who assist with managing CHS for patients in general medical settings. The goal of this research is to establish evidence-based treatment guidelines for C-L psychiatrists who are managing patients with CHS in general medical settings. Recognizing the limitations of this algorithm being based on case reports adds to the necessity of further research in this area. Registration: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021254888) registration number CRD42021254888.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius